Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To identify and thematically analyse how healthcare professionals (HCPs) integrate patient values and preferences (‘values integration’) in primary care for adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).</p> <br> <p><strong>Des...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
| _version_ | 1811141121543241728 |
|---|---|
| author | Tringale, M Stephen, G Boylan, A-M Heneghan, C |
| author_facet | Tringale, M Stephen, G Boylan, A-M Heneghan, C |
| author_sort | Tringale, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To identify and thematically analyse how healthcare professionals (HCPs) integrate patient values and preferences (‘values integration’) in primary care for adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).</p>
<br>
<p><strong>Design:</strong> Systematic review and meta-aggregation methods were used for extraction, synthesis and analysis of qualitative evidence.</p>
<br>
<p><strong>Data sources:</strong> Relevant records were sourced using keywords to search 12 databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, ERIC, Google Scholar, GreyLit, Ovid-MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science).</p>
<br>
<p><strong>Eligibility criteria:</strong> Records needed to be published between 2000 and 2020 and report qualitative methods and findings in English involving HCP participants regarding primary care for adult patients.</p>
<br>
<p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis:</strong> Relevant data including participant quotations, authors’ observations, interpretations and conclusions were extracted, synthesised and analysed in a phased approach using a modified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Data Extraction Tool, as well as EPPI Reviewer and NVivo software. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess methodological quality of included records.</p>
<br>
<p><strong>Results:</strong> Thirty-one records involving >1032 HCP participants and 1823 HCP-patient encounters were reviewed. Findings included 143 approaches to values integration in clinical care, thematically analysed and synthesised into four themes: (1) approaches of concern; (2) approaches of competence; (3) approaches of communication and (4) approaches of congruence. Confidence in the quality of included records was deemed high.</p>
<br>
<p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> HCPs incorporate patient values and preferences in healthcare through a variety of approaches including showing concern for the patient as a person, demonstrating competence at managing diseases, communicating with patients as partners and tailoring, adjusting and balancing overall care. Themes in this review provide a novel framework for understanding and addressing values integration in clinical care and provide useful insights for policymakers, educators and practitioners.</p>
<br>
<p><strong>PROSPERO registration number:</strong> CRD42020166002.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:32:50Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:096d247e-dae3-41ad-a626-69dbb6e3d1c8 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:32:50Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:096d247e-dae3-41ad-a626-69dbb6e3d1c82024-09-09T15:20:28ZIntegrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidenceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:096d247e-dae3-41ad-a626-69dbb6e3d1c8EnglishSymplectic ElementsBMJ Publishing Group2022Tringale, MStephen, GBoylan, A-MHeneghan, C<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To identify and thematically analyse how healthcare professionals (HCPs) integrate patient values and preferences (‘values integration’) in primary care for adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).</p> <br> <p><strong>Design:</strong> Systematic review and meta-aggregation methods were used for extraction, synthesis and analysis of qualitative evidence.</p> <br> <p><strong>Data sources:</strong> Relevant records were sourced using keywords to search 12 databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, ERIC, Google Scholar, GreyLit, Ovid-MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science).</p> <br> <p><strong>Eligibility criteria:</strong> Records needed to be published between 2000 and 2020 and report qualitative methods and findings in English involving HCP participants regarding primary care for adult patients.</p> <br> <p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis:</strong> Relevant data including participant quotations, authors’ observations, interpretations and conclusions were extracted, synthesised and analysed in a phased approach using a modified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Data Extraction Tool, as well as EPPI Reviewer and NVivo software. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess methodological quality of included records.</p> <br> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Thirty-one records involving >1032 HCP participants and 1823 HCP-patient encounters were reviewed. Findings included 143 approaches to values integration in clinical care, thematically analysed and synthesised into four themes: (1) approaches of concern; (2) approaches of competence; (3) approaches of communication and (4) approaches of congruence. Confidence in the quality of included records was deemed high.</p> <br> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> HCPs incorporate patient values and preferences in healthcare through a variety of approaches including showing concern for the patient as a person, demonstrating competence at managing diseases, communicating with patients as partners and tailoring, adjusting and balancing overall care. Themes in this review provide a novel framework for understanding and addressing values integration in clinical care and provide useful insights for policymakers, educators and practitioners.</p> <br> <p><strong>PROSPERO registration number:</strong> CRD42020166002.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Tringale, M Stephen, G Boylan, A-M Heneghan, C Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence |
| title | Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence |
| title_full | Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence |
| title_fullStr | Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence |
| title_full_unstemmed | Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence |
| title_short | Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence |
| title_sort | integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare a systematic review of qualitative evidence |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tringalem integratingpatientvaluesandpreferencesinhealthcareasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence AT stepheng integratingpatientvaluesandpreferencesinhealthcareasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence AT boylanam integratingpatientvaluesandpreferencesinhealthcareasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence AT heneghanc integratingpatientvaluesandpreferencesinhealthcareasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence |