'You think your writing belongs to you?': Intertextuality in contemporary Jewish post-Holocaust literature
This article examines a sub-category of recent Jewish post-Holocaust fiction that engages with the absent memory of the persecution its authors did not personally witness through the medium of intertextuality, but with intertextual recourse not to testimonial writing but to literature only unwitting...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
MDPI
2018
|
| _version_ | 1797052400746364928 |
|---|---|
| author | Gwyer, K |
| author_facet | Gwyer, K |
| author_sort | Gwyer, K |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This article examines a sub-category of recent Jewish post-Holocaust fiction that engages with the absent memory of the persecution its authors did not personally witness through the medium of intertextuality, but with intertextual recourse not to testimonial writing but to literature only unwittingly or retrospectively shadowed by the Holocaust. It will be proposed that this practice of intertextuality constitutes a response to the post-Holocaust Jewish author’s ‘anxiety of influence’ that, in the wake of the first generation’s experience of atrocity, their own life story and literature will always appear derivative. With reference to works by four such post-Holocaust authors, Jonathan Safran Foer’s Tree of Codes (2010), Maxim Biller’s Im Kopf von Bruno Schulz (2013), Helen Maryles Shankman’s In the Land of Armadillos (2016), and Nicole Krauss’s The History of Love (2005) and Forest Dark (2017), all of which engage intertextually with Franz Kafka and Bruno Schulz, it will be suggested that these authors are looking to return to a Kristevan practice of intertextuality after the predominantly citational recourse to antecedent material that has often characterized post-Holocaust literature. In the process, they also succeed in troubling recently popular conceptualizations of ‘postmemory’ literature as the ‘belated’ and ‘evacuated’ recipient of encrypted traumatic content inherited from the first generation that it must now seek either to preserve or to work through vicariously |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:31:05Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:09ad7bf3-2249-4320-b1da-c2dcdd64658f |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:31:05Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | MDPI |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:09ad7bf3-2249-4320-b1da-c2dcdd64658f2022-03-26T09:19:37Z'You think your writing belongs to you?': Intertextuality in contemporary Jewish post-Holocaust literatureJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:09ad7bf3-2249-4320-b1da-c2dcdd64658fSymplectic Elements at OxfordMDPI2018Gwyer, KThis article examines a sub-category of recent Jewish post-Holocaust fiction that engages with the absent memory of the persecution its authors did not personally witness through the medium of intertextuality, but with intertextual recourse not to testimonial writing but to literature only unwittingly or retrospectively shadowed by the Holocaust. It will be proposed that this practice of intertextuality constitutes a response to the post-Holocaust Jewish author’s ‘anxiety of influence’ that, in the wake of the first generation’s experience of atrocity, their own life story and literature will always appear derivative. With reference to works by four such post-Holocaust authors, Jonathan Safran Foer’s Tree of Codes (2010), Maxim Biller’s Im Kopf von Bruno Schulz (2013), Helen Maryles Shankman’s In the Land of Armadillos (2016), and Nicole Krauss’s The History of Love (2005) and Forest Dark (2017), all of which engage intertextually with Franz Kafka and Bruno Schulz, it will be suggested that these authors are looking to return to a Kristevan practice of intertextuality after the predominantly citational recourse to antecedent material that has often characterized post-Holocaust literature. In the process, they also succeed in troubling recently popular conceptualizations of ‘postmemory’ literature as the ‘belated’ and ‘evacuated’ recipient of encrypted traumatic content inherited from the first generation that it must now seek either to preserve or to work through vicariously |
| spellingShingle | Gwyer, K 'You think your writing belongs to you?': Intertextuality in contemporary Jewish post-Holocaust literature |
| title | 'You think your writing belongs to you?': Intertextuality in contemporary Jewish post-Holocaust literature |
| title_full | 'You think your writing belongs to you?': Intertextuality in contemporary Jewish post-Holocaust literature |
| title_fullStr | 'You think your writing belongs to you?': Intertextuality in contemporary Jewish post-Holocaust literature |
| title_full_unstemmed | 'You think your writing belongs to you?': Intertextuality in contemporary Jewish post-Holocaust literature |
| title_short | 'You think your writing belongs to you?': Intertextuality in contemporary Jewish post-Holocaust literature |
| title_sort | you think your writing belongs to you intertextuality in contemporary jewish post holocaust literature |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gwyerk youthinkyourwritingbelongstoyouintertextualityincontemporaryjewishpostholocaustliterature |