Maturity and methodology: Starting a debate about environmental law scholarship

Many environmental law scholars perceive environmental law scholarship as immature. We discuss why this self-perception has arisen and argue that a common theme is methodology. We argue that the subject can only mature when we face its methodological challenges head on, and we identify four particul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fisher, E, Lange, B, Scotford, E, Carlarne, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2009
_version_ 1826258268851273728
author Fisher, E
Lange, B
Scotford, E
Carlarne, C
author_facet Fisher, E
Lange, B
Scotford, E
Carlarne, C
author_sort Fisher, E
collection OXFORD
description Many environmental law scholars perceive environmental law scholarship as immature. We discuss why this self-perception has arisen and argue that a common theme is methodology. We argue that the subject can only mature when we face its methodological challenges head on, and we identify four particular issues that have given rise to these challenges: the speed and scale of legal/regulatory change, the interdisciplinary nature of the subject, the heavy reliance in environmental law on a diverse range of governance arrangements and the multi-jurisdictional nature of the subject. We argue that there is a need for debate in the face of these challenges and identify some starting points for that debate. © The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:31:17Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:09bcc4ed-8ad5-414d-bcd1-f9542563fde7
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:31:17Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:09bcc4ed-8ad5-414d-bcd1-f9542563fde72022-03-26T09:19:55ZMaturity and methodology: Starting a debate about environmental law scholarshipJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:09bcc4ed-8ad5-414d-bcd1-f9542563fde7EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2009Fisher, ELange, BScotford, ECarlarne, CMany environmental law scholars perceive environmental law scholarship as immature. We discuss why this self-perception has arisen and argue that a common theme is methodology. We argue that the subject can only mature when we face its methodological challenges head on, and we identify four particular issues that have given rise to these challenges: the speed and scale of legal/regulatory change, the interdisciplinary nature of the subject, the heavy reliance in environmental law on a diverse range of governance arrangements and the multi-jurisdictional nature of the subject. We argue that there is a need for debate in the face of these challenges and identify some starting points for that debate. © The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Fisher, E
Lange, B
Scotford, E
Carlarne, C
Maturity and methodology: Starting a debate about environmental law scholarship
title Maturity and methodology: Starting a debate about environmental law scholarship
title_full Maturity and methodology: Starting a debate about environmental law scholarship
title_fullStr Maturity and methodology: Starting a debate about environmental law scholarship
title_full_unstemmed Maturity and methodology: Starting a debate about environmental law scholarship
title_short Maturity and methodology: Starting a debate about environmental law scholarship
title_sort maturity and methodology starting a debate about environmental law scholarship
work_keys_str_mv AT fishere maturityandmethodologystartingadebateaboutenvironmentallawscholarship
AT langeb maturityandmethodologystartingadebateaboutenvironmentallawscholarship
AT scotforde maturityandmethodologystartingadebateaboutenvironmentallawscholarship
AT carlarnec maturityandmethodologystartingadebateaboutenvironmentallawscholarship