Systematic review did not consider problem of treatment effects.

Systematic review did not consider problem of treatment effects.

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Liew, S, Doust, J, Glasziou, P
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2012

Similar Items

Cardiovascular risk scores do not account for the effect of treatment: a review.
by: Liew, S, et al.
Published: (2011)

Cardiovascular risk scores do not account for the effect of treatment: a review.
by: Liew, S.M., et al.
Published: (2011)

A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of natriuretic peptides for heart failure.
by: Doust, J, et al.
Published: (2004)

Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.
by: Doust, J, et al.
Published: (2005)

How well does B-type natriuretic peptide predict death and cardiac events in patients with heart failure: systematic review.
by: Doust, J, et al.
Published: (2005)

How well does B-type natriuretic peptide predict death and cardiac events in patients with heart failure: systematic review
by: Doust, J, et al.
Published: (2005)

Cardiac impairment or heart failure?
by: Lehman, R, et al.
Published: (2005)

In reply [1]
by: Doust, J, et al.
Published: (2005)

The role of BNP testing in heart failure.
by: Doust, J, et al.
Published: (2006)

Cardiac impairment or heart failure?
by: Lehman, R, et al.
Published: (2005)

Prioritising CVD prevention therapy - absolute risk versus individual risk factors.
by: Doust, J, et al.
Published: (2012)

Diagnostic accuracy of nitroglycerine as a 'test of treatment' for cardiac chest pain: A systematic review
by: Grailey, K, et al.
Published: (2011)

COVID19 biomarkers: What did we learn from systematic reviews?
by: Sabina Semiz
Published: (2022-12-01)

What I did or did not do
by: Gerald McCarthy
Published: (2020-06-01)

Doctors who considered but did not pursue specific clinical specialties as careers: questionnaire surveys.
by: Goldacre, M, et al.
Published: (2012)

Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews.
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2002)

Studying systematic reviews.
by: Del Mar, C, et al.
Published: (2001)

Systematization of Nursing Care: how did the concept mature?
by: Jackeline Felix de Souza, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Looking for reviewers - where did they go?
by: ALEXANDER W.A. KELLNER
Published: (2023-12-01)

Reporting of effect direction and size in abstracts of systematic reviews.
by: Beller, E, et al.
Published: (2011)

Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials?
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2006)

Psychopharmacological treatment in dissociative identity disorder (DID)
by: R. Pinilla, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Effect of spectacles on changes of spherical hypermetropia in infants who did, and did not, have strabismus.
by: Ingram, R, et al.
Published: (2000)

Did they leave or not?
by: Dagmar Dreslerová, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

A simple method to correct for the design effect in systematic reviews of trials using paired dichotomous data.
by: Perera, R, et al.
Published: (2007)

Book Review: How Did Morality Originate?
by: Dennis L. Krebs, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Cats Did Not Change Their Problem-Solving Behaviours after Human Demonstrations
by: Minori Arahori, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

How did mental health became a problem in working life?
by: Ari Väänänen
Published: (2022-01-01)

Did Foucault do Ethics? The "Ethical Turn," Neoliberalism, and the Problem of Truth
by: Patrick Gamez
Published: (2018-06-01)

Schematherapy in DID: treatment length and related studies on dissociative amnesia
by: R. J. C. Huntjens, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Systematic reviews should consider effects from both the population and the individual perspective
by: Verbeek, J, et al.
Published: (2021)

Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
by: Bennett, J, et al.
Published: (2003)

Updating a systematic review - What difference did it make? Case study of nicotine replacement therapy
by: Stead, L, et al.
Published: (2001)

Updating a systematic review--what difference did it make? Case study of nicotine replacement therapy.
by: Stead, L, et al.
Published: (2001)

Questions and answers in the management of children with medulloblastoma over the time. How did we get here? A systematic review
by: Marta P. Osuna-Marco, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

A systematic review and meta-analysis: probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.
by: Hoveyda, N, et al.
Published: (2009)

Systematic clinical examination of early postpartum cows and treatment of puerperal metritis did not have any beneficial effect on subsequent reproductive performance
by: R. Dolezel, et al.
Published: (2008-02-01)

Effect of alpha linolenic acid on cardiovascular risk markers: a systematic review.
by: Wendland, E, et al.
Published: (2006)

Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
by: Catty, J, et al.
Published: (2002)

Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
by: Burns, T, et al.
Published: (2001)