Betwixt feeling and thinking: two-level accounts of experience

What sense can we make of Hume’s notorious distinction between impressions and ideas? We look at two sense-datum theories of experience that offer competing accounts of the contrast between sensation and imagination. John Foster’s two-level account of experience presented in <i>The Case for Id...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin, MGF
Other Authors: Knowles, J
Format: Book section
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2019
_version_ 1797112543342231552
author Martin, MGF
author2 Knowles, J
author_facet Knowles, J
Martin, MGF
author_sort Martin, MGF
collection OXFORD
description What sense can we make of Hume’s notorious distinction between impressions and ideas? We look at two sense-datum theories of experience that offer competing accounts of the contrast between sensation and imagination. John Foster’s two-level account of experience presented in <i>The Case for Idealism</i> and <i>The Nature of Perception</i> is contrasted with Bertrand Russell’s discussion of sensation, imagination, and memory in <i>The Theory of Knowledge</i>. The key elements of both approaches are sketched. Foster’s appeal simply to a ‘subjectively manifest’ difference is rejected as inadequate. A problem with Russell’s conception of experience of past is canvassed, and then further elaborated in relation to previous awareness condition on personal memories. The contrasting views of memory are extended to the case of imagination. The chapter concludes with more general morals to be drawn about the relation between the first-person perspective on experience and the underlying psychological properties which explain experience’s being so.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:25:37Z
format Book section
id oxford-uuid:0a7dbc65-15ed-4d80-b52d-104f1b901390
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:25:37Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:0a7dbc65-15ed-4d80-b52d-104f1b9013902024-02-16T15:25:37ZBetwixt feeling and thinking: two-level accounts of experienceBook sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843uuid:0a7dbc65-15ed-4d80-b52d-104f1b901390EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2019Martin, MGFKnowles, JRaleigh, TWhat sense can we make of Hume’s notorious distinction between impressions and ideas? We look at two sense-datum theories of experience that offer competing accounts of the contrast between sensation and imagination. John Foster’s two-level account of experience presented in <i>The Case for Idealism</i> and <i>The Nature of Perception</i> is contrasted with Bertrand Russell’s discussion of sensation, imagination, and memory in <i>The Theory of Knowledge</i>. The key elements of both approaches are sketched. Foster’s appeal simply to a ‘subjectively manifest’ difference is rejected as inadequate. A problem with Russell’s conception of experience of past is canvassed, and then further elaborated in relation to previous awareness condition on personal memories. The contrasting views of memory are extended to the case of imagination. The chapter concludes with more general morals to be drawn about the relation between the first-person perspective on experience and the underlying psychological properties which explain experience’s being so.
spellingShingle Martin, MGF
Betwixt feeling and thinking: two-level accounts of experience
title Betwixt feeling and thinking: two-level accounts of experience
title_full Betwixt feeling and thinking: two-level accounts of experience
title_fullStr Betwixt feeling and thinking: two-level accounts of experience
title_full_unstemmed Betwixt feeling and thinking: two-level accounts of experience
title_short Betwixt feeling and thinking: two-level accounts of experience
title_sort betwixt feeling and thinking two level accounts of experience
work_keys_str_mv AT martinmgf betwixtfeelingandthinkingtwolevelaccountsofexperience