The dominant role of mergers in the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies since z ~ 1
In this paper we measure the merger fraction and rate, both minor and major, of massive early-type galaxies (M_star >= 10^11 M_Sun) in the COSMOS field, and study their role in mass and size evolution. We use the 30-band photometric catalogue in COSMOS, complemented with the spectroscopy of t...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2012
|
| _version_ | 1826258481639849984 |
|---|---|
| author | López-Sanjuan, C Fèvre, O Ilbert, O Tasca, L Bridge, C Cucciati, O Kampczyk, P Pozzetti, L Xu, C Carollo, C Contini, T Kneib, J Lilly, S Mainieri, V Renzini, A Sanders, D Scodeggio, M Scoville, N Taniguchi, Y Zamorani, G Aussel, H Bardelli, S Bolzonella, M Bongiorno, A Capak, P |
| author_facet | López-Sanjuan, C Fèvre, O Ilbert, O Tasca, L Bridge, C Cucciati, O Kampczyk, P Pozzetti, L Xu, C Carollo, C Contini, T Kneib, J Lilly, S Mainieri, V Renzini, A Sanders, D Scodeggio, M Scoville, N Taniguchi, Y Zamorani, G Aussel, H Bardelli, S Bolzonella, M Bongiorno, A Capak, P |
| author_sort | López-Sanjuan, C |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In this paper we measure the merger fraction and rate, both minor and major, of massive early-type galaxies (M_star >= 10^11 M_Sun) in the COSMOS field, and study their role in mass and size evolution. We use the 30-band photometric catalogue in COSMOS, complemented with the spectroscopy of the zCOSMOS survey, to define close pairs with a separation 10h^-1 kpc <= r_p <= 30h-1 kpc and a relative velocity Delta v <= 500 km s^-1. We measure both major (stellar mass ratio mu = M_star,2/M_star,1 >= 1/4) and minor (1/10 <= mu < 1/4) merger fractions of massive galaxies, and study their dependence on redshift and on morphology. The merger fraction and rate of massive galaxies evolves as a power-law (1+z)^n, with major mergers increasing with redshift, n_MM = 1.4, and minor mergers showing little evolution, n_mm ~ 0. When split by their morphology, the minor merger fraction for early types is higher by a factor of three than that for spirals, and both are nearly constant with redshift. Our results show that massive early-type galaxies have undergone 0.89 mergers (0.43 major and 0.46 minor) since z ~ 1, leading to a mass growth of ~30%. We find that mu >= 1/10 mergers can explain ~55% of the observed size evolution of these galaxies since z ~ 1. Another ~20% is due to the progenitor bias (younger galaxies are more extended) and we estimate that very minor mergers (mu < 1/10) could contribute with an extra ~20%. The remaining ~5% should come from other processes (e.g., adiabatic expansion or observational effects). This picture also reproduces the mass growth and velocity dispersion evolution of these galaxies. We conclude from these results that merging is the main contributor to the size evolution of massive ETGs at z <= 1, accounting for ~50-75% of that evolution in the last 8 Gyr. Nearly half of the evolution due to mergers is related to minor (mu < 1/4) events. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:34:39Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:0acf84fd-bf4a-4a0e-ab42-310bb9ee570f |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:34:39Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:0acf84fd-bf4a-4a0e-ab42-310bb9ee570f2022-03-26T09:26:00ZThe dominant role of mergers in the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies since z ~ 1Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:0acf84fd-bf4a-4a0e-ab42-310bb9ee570fEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012López-Sanjuan, CFèvre, OIlbert, OTasca, LBridge, CCucciati, OKampczyk, PPozzetti, LXu, CCarollo, CContini, TKneib, JLilly, SMainieri, VRenzini, ASanders, DScodeggio, MScoville, NTaniguchi, YZamorani, GAussel, HBardelli, SBolzonella, MBongiorno, ACapak, PIn this paper we measure the merger fraction and rate, both minor and major, of massive early-type galaxies (M_star >= 10^11 M_Sun) in the COSMOS field, and study their role in mass and size evolution. We use the 30-band photometric catalogue in COSMOS, complemented with the spectroscopy of the zCOSMOS survey, to define close pairs with a separation 10h^-1 kpc <= r_p <= 30h-1 kpc and a relative velocity Delta v <= 500 km s^-1. We measure both major (stellar mass ratio mu = M_star,2/M_star,1 >= 1/4) and minor (1/10 <= mu < 1/4) merger fractions of massive galaxies, and study their dependence on redshift and on morphology. The merger fraction and rate of massive galaxies evolves as a power-law (1+z)^n, with major mergers increasing with redshift, n_MM = 1.4, and minor mergers showing little evolution, n_mm ~ 0. When split by their morphology, the minor merger fraction for early types is higher by a factor of three than that for spirals, and both are nearly constant with redshift. Our results show that massive early-type galaxies have undergone 0.89 mergers (0.43 major and 0.46 minor) since z ~ 1, leading to a mass growth of ~30%. We find that mu >= 1/10 mergers can explain ~55% of the observed size evolution of these galaxies since z ~ 1. Another ~20% is due to the progenitor bias (younger galaxies are more extended) and we estimate that very minor mergers (mu < 1/10) could contribute with an extra ~20%. The remaining ~5% should come from other processes (e.g., adiabatic expansion or observational effects). This picture also reproduces the mass growth and velocity dispersion evolution of these galaxies. We conclude from these results that merging is the main contributor to the size evolution of massive ETGs at z <= 1, accounting for ~50-75% of that evolution in the last 8 Gyr. Nearly half of the evolution due to mergers is related to minor (mu < 1/4) events. |
| spellingShingle | López-Sanjuan, C Fèvre, O Ilbert, O Tasca, L Bridge, C Cucciati, O Kampczyk, P Pozzetti, L Xu, C Carollo, C Contini, T Kneib, J Lilly, S Mainieri, V Renzini, A Sanders, D Scodeggio, M Scoville, N Taniguchi, Y Zamorani, G Aussel, H Bardelli, S Bolzonella, M Bongiorno, A Capak, P The dominant role of mergers in the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies since z ~ 1 |
| title | The dominant role of mergers in the size evolution of massive early-type
galaxies since z ~ 1 |
| title_full | The dominant role of mergers in the size evolution of massive early-type
galaxies since z ~ 1 |
| title_fullStr | The dominant role of mergers in the size evolution of massive early-type
galaxies since z ~ 1 |
| title_full_unstemmed | The dominant role of mergers in the size evolution of massive early-type
galaxies since z ~ 1 |
| title_short | The dominant role of mergers in the size evolution of massive early-type
galaxies since z ~ 1 |
| title_sort | dominant role of mergers in the size evolution of massive early type galaxies since z 1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezsanjuanc thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT fevreo thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT ilberto thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT tascal thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT bridgec thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT cucciatio thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT kampczykp thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT pozzettil thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT xuc thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT carolloc thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT continit thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT kneibj thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT lillys thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT mainieriv thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT renzinia thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT sandersd thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT scodeggiom thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT scovillen thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT taniguchiy thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT zamoranig thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT ausselh thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT bardellis thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT bolzonellam thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT bongiornoa thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT capakp thedominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT lopezsanjuanc dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT fevreo dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT ilberto dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT tascal dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT bridgec dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT cucciatio dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT kampczykp dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT pozzettil dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT xuc dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT carolloc dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT continit dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT kneibj dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT lillys dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT mainieriv dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT renzinia dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT sandersd dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT scodeggiom dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT scovillen dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT taniguchiy dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT zamoranig dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT ausselh dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT bardellis dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT bolzonellam dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT bongiornoa dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 AT capakp dominantroleofmergersinthesizeevolutionofmassiveearlytypegalaxiessincez1 |