Extracting angles of attack from blade-resolved rotor CFD simulations
The distribution of the angles of attack over the span of a rotor blade, together with blade element theory, provides a useful framework to understand forces, performance and other fluid dynamic phenomena of axial‐flow rotors. However, the angle of attack is not straightforward to define for a three...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020
|
| _version_ | 1797052923038924800 |
|---|---|
| author | Vogel, C Zilic de Arcos, F Willden, R |
| author_facet | Vogel, C Zilic de Arcos, F Willden, R |
| author_sort | Vogel, C |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The distribution of the angles of attack over the span of a rotor blade, together with blade element theory, provides a useful framework to understand forces, performance and other fluid dynamic phenomena of axial‐flow rotors. However, the angle of attack is not straightforward to define for a three‐dimensional rotor, where the flow is perturbed by the blade circulation, shed vorticity and wake development.
<br><br/>
This paper evaluates six methods to extract the angles of attack from blade‐resolved CFD simulations of axial‐flow turbines. Simulations of two different rotors are presented: a low solidity rotor designed for wind and a higher solidity rotor designed for tidal stream energy conversion. Of the analysed methods, five were obtained from the literature and are tested in terms of their internal parameters. The remaining method is named the streamtube analysis method (SAM) and is presented as an improvement on analysis methods that azimuthally average the flow data on the rotor plane, referred to as azimuthal averaging techniques (AATs). The SAM method accounts for the expansion of the streamtubes in flow‐field velocity sampling and exhibits improved convergence on the internal parameters compared with AAT.
<br><br/>
The six methods are benchmarked in terms of the angles of attack, axial induction factors and the local lift and drag coefficients, identifying that most perform well and converge with each other despite the different underlying assumptions or modelling approaches. However, given the limitations and inherent dependency on internal parameters, the line averaging and SAM are suggested for general flow analysis application. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:37:23Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:0bb4b689-6375-4de1-9c6b-3e000460b330 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:37:23Z |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:0bb4b689-6375-4de1-9c6b-3e000460b3302022-03-26T09:30:56ZExtracting angles of attack from blade-resolved rotor CFD simulationsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:0bb4b689-6375-4de1-9c6b-3e000460b330EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2020Vogel, CZilic de Arcos, FWillden, RThe distribution of the angles of attack over the span of a rotor blade, together with blade element theory, provides a useful framework to understand forces, performance and other fluid dynamic phenomena of axial‐flow rotors. However, the angle of attack is not straightforward to define for a three‐dimensional rotor, where the flow is perturbed by the blade circulation, shed vorticity and wake development. <br><br/> This paper evaluates six methods to extract the angles of attack from blade‐resolved CFD simulations of axial‐flow turbines. Simulations of two different rotors are presented: a low solidity rotor designed for wind and a higher solidity rotor designed for tidal stream energy conversion. Of the analysed methods, five were obtained from the literature and are tested in terms of their internal parameters. The remaining method is named the streamtube analysis method (SAM) and is presented as an improvement on analysis methods that azimuthally average the flow data on the rotor plane, referred to as azimuthal averaging techniques (AATs). The SAM method accounts for the expansion of the streamtubes in flow‐field velocity sampling and exhibits improved convergence on the internal parameters compared with AAT. <br><br/> The six methods are benchmarked in terms of the angles of attack, axial induction factors and the local lift and drag coefficients, identifying that most perform well and converge with each other despite the different underlying assumptions or modelling approaches. However, given the limitations and inherent dependency on internal parameters, the line averaging and SAM are suggested for general flow analysis application. |
| spellingShingle | Vogel, C Zilic de Arcos, F Willden, R Extracting angles of attack from blade-resolved rotor CFD simulations |
| title | Extracting angles of attack from blade-resolved rotor CFD simulations |
| title_full | Extracting angles of attack from blade-resolved rotor CFD simulations |
| title_fullStr | Extracting angles of attack from blade-resolved rotor CFD simulations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Extracting angles of attack from blade-resolved rotor CFD simulations |
| title_short | Extracting angles of attack from blade-resolved rotor CFD simulations |
| title_sort | extracting angles of attack from blade resolved rotor cfd simulations |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vogelc extractinganglesofattackfrombladeresolvedrotorcfdsimulations AT zilicdearcosf extractinganglesofattackfrombladeresolvedrotorcfdsimulations AT willdenr extractinganglesofattackfrombladeresolvedrotorcfdsimulations |