Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game
The producer–scrounger game is a key element of foraging ecology in many systems. Producing and scrounging typically covary negatively, but partitioning this covariance into contributions of individual plasticity and consistent between individual differences is key to understanding population-level...
| Үндсэн зохиолчид: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Journal article |
| Хэл сонгох: | English |
| Хэвлэсэн: |
Wiley
2021
|
| _version_ | 1826307915758174208 |
|---|---|
| author | Reichert, MS Morand-Ferron, J Kulahci, IG Firth, JA Davidson, GL Crofts, SJ Quinn, JL |
| author_facet | Reichert, MS Morand-Ferron, J Kulahci, IG Firth, JA Davidson, GL Crofts, SJ Quinn, JL |
| author_sort | Reichert, MS |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The producer–scrounger game is a key element of foraging ecology in many systems. Producing and scrounging typically covary negatively, but partitioning this covariance into contributions of individual plasticity and consistent between individual differences is key to understanding population-level consequences of foraging strategies. Furthermore, little is known about the role cognition plays in the producer–scrounger game.
We investigated the role of cognition in these alternative foraging tactics in wild mixed-species flocks of great tits and blue tits, using a production learning task in which we measured individuals’ speed of learning to visit the single feeder in an array that would provide them with a food reward. We also quantified the proportion of individuals’ feeds that were scrounges (‘proportion scrounged’); scrounging was possible if individuals visited immediately after a previous rewarded visitor. Three learning experiments—initial and two reversal learning—enabled us to estimate the repeatability and covariance of each foraging behaviour.
First, we examined whether individuals learned to improve their scrounging success (i.e. whether they obtained food by scrounging when there was an opportunity to do so). Second, we quantified the repeatability of proportion scrounged, and asked whether proportion scrounged affected production learning speed among individuals. Third, we used multivariate analyses to partition within- and among-individual components of covariance between proportion scrounged and production learning speed.
Individuals improved their scrounging success over time. Birds with a greater proportion scrounged took longer to learn their own rewarding feeder. Although multivariate analyses showed that covariance between proportion scrounged and learning speed was driven primarily by within-individual variation, that is, by behavioural plasticity, among-individual differences also played a role for blue tits.
This is the first demonstration of a cognitive trait influencing producing and scrounging in the same wild system, highlighting the importance of cognition in the use of alternative resource acquisition tactics. The results of our covariance analyses suggest the potential for genetic differences in allocation to alternative foraging tactics, which are likely species- and system-dependent. They also point to the need to control for different foraging tactics when studying individual cognition in the wild.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:10:13Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:0c4d605a-ed58-4c46-adaf-6e211bc9deac |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:10:13Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:0c4d605a-ed58-4c46-adaf-6e211bc9deac2022-06-29T08:03:31ZCognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger gameJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:0c4d605a-ed58-4c46-adaf-6e211bc9deacEnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2021Reichert, MSMorand-Ferron, JKulahci, IGFirth, JADavidson, GLCrofts, SJQuinn, JLThe producer–scrounger game is a key element of foraging ecology in many systems. Producing and scrounging typically covary negatively, but partitioning this covariance into contributions of individual plasticity and consistent between individual differences is key to understanding population-level consequences of foraging strategies. Furthermore, little is known about the role cognition plays in the producer–scrounger game. We investigated the role of cognition in these alternative foraging tactics in wild mixed-species flocks of great tits and blue tits, using a production learning task in which we measured individuals’ speed of learning to visit the single feeder in an array that would provide them with a food reward. We also quantified the proportion of individuals’ feeds that were scrounges (‘proportion scrounged’); scrounging was possible if individuals visited immediately after a previous rewarded visitor. Three learning experiments—initial and two reversal learning—enabled us to estimate the repeatability and covariance of each foraging behaviour. First, we examined whether individuals learned to improve their scrounging success (i.e. whether they obtained food by scrounging when there was an opportunity to do so). Second, we quantified the repeatability of proportion scrounged, and asked whether proportion scrounged affected production learning speed among individuals. Third, we used multivariate analyses to partition within- and among-individual components of covariance between proportion scrounged and production learning speed. Individuals improved their scrounging success over time. Birds with a greater proportion scrounged took longer to learn their own rewarding feeder. Although multivariate analyses showed that covariance between proportion scrounged and learning speed was driven primarily by within-individual variation, that is, by behavioural plasticity, among-individual differences also played a role for blue tits. This is the first demonstration of a cognitive trait influencing producing and scrounging in the same wild system, highlighting the importance of cognition in the use of alternative resource acquisition tactics. The results of our covariance analyses suggest the potential for genetic differences in allocation to alternative foraging tactics, which are likely species- and system-dependent. They also point to the need to control for different foraging tactics when studying individual cognition in the wild. |
| spellingShingle | Reichert, MS Morand-Ferron, J Kulahci, IG Firth, JA Davidson, GL Crofts, SJ Quinn, JL Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game |
| title | Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game |
| title_full | Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game |
| title_fullStr | Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game |
| title_short | Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game |
| title_sort | cognition and covariance in the producer scrounger game |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT reichertms cognitionandcovarianceintheproducerscroungergame AT morandferronj cognitionandcovarianceintheproducerscroungergame AT kulahciig cognitionandcovarianceintheproducerscroungergame AT firthja cognitionandcovarianceintheproducerscroungergame AT davidsongl cognitionandcovarianceintheproducerscroungergame AT croftssj cognitionandcovarianceintheproducerscroungergame AT quinnjl cognitionandcovarianceintheproducerscroungergame |