Constant inapproximability for PPA

<p>In the &epsilon;-Consensus-Halving problem, we are given n probability measures v1, . . . , vn on the interval R = [0, 1], and the goal is to partition R into two parts R+ and R&minus; using at most n cuts, so that |vi(R+) &minus; vi(R&minus;)| &le; &epsilon; for all...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deligkas, A, Fearnley, J, Hollender, A, Melissourgos, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 2024
_version_ 1817931525036965888
author Deligkas, A
Fearnley, J
Hollender, A
Melissourgos, T
author_facet Deligkas, A
Fearnley, J
Hollender, A
Melissourgos, T
author_sort Deligkas, A
collection OXFORD
description <p>In the &epsilon;-Consensus-Halving problem, we are given n probability measures v1, . . . , vn on the interval R = [0, 1], and the goal is to partition R into two parts R+ and R&minus; using at most n cuts, so that |vi(R+) &minus; vi(R&minus;)| &le; &epsilon; for all i. This fundamental fair division problem was the first natural problem shown to be complete for the class PPA, and all subsequent PPA-completeness results for other natural problems have been obtained by reducing from it. We show that &epsilon;-Consensus-Halving is PPA-complete even when the parameter &epsilon; is a constant. In fact, we prove that this holds for any constant &epsilon; &lt; 1/5. As a result, we obtain constant inapproximability results for all known natural PPA-complete problems, including Necklace-Splitting, the Discrete-Ham-Sandwich problem, two variants of the pizza sharing problem, and for finding fair independent sets in cycles and paths.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-09T03:23:24Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:0c4fbbb9-9705-4eac-9eea-98adbe08c3b3
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-09T03:23:24Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:0c4fbbb9-9705-4eac-9eea-98adbe08c3b32024-11-25T10:01:46ZConstant inapproximability for PPAJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:0c4fbbb9-9705-4eac-9eea-98adbe08c3b3EnglishSymplectic ElementsSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics2024Deligkas, AFearnley, JHollender, AMelissourgos, T<p>In the &epsilon;-Consensus-Halving problem, we are given n probability measures v1, . . . , vn on the interval R = [0, 1], and the goal is to partition R into two parts R+ and R&minus; using at most n cuts, so that |vi(R+) &minus; vi(R&minus;)| &le; &epsilon; for all i. This fundamental fair division problem was the first natural problem shown to be complete for the class PPA, and all subsequent PPA-completeness results for other natural problems have been obtained by reducing from it. We show that &epsilon;-Consensus-Halving is PPA-complete even when the parameter &epsilon; is a constant. In fact, we prove that this holds for any constant &epsilon; &lt; 1/5. As a result, we obtain constant inapproximability results for all known natural PPA-complete problems, including Necklace-Splitting, the Discrete-Ham-Sandwich problem, two variants of the pizza sharing problem, and for finding fair independent sets in cycles and paths.</p>
spellingShingle Deligkas, A
Fearnley, J
Hollender, A
Melissourgos, T
Constant inapproximability for PPA
title Constant inapproximability for PPA
title_full Constant inapproximability for PPA
title_fullStr Constant inapproximability for PPA
title_full_unstemmed Constant inapproximability for PPA
title_short Constant inapproximability for PPA
title_sort constant inapproximability for ppa
work_keys_str_mv AT deligkasa constantinapproximabilityforppa
AT fearnleyj constantinapproximabilityforppa
AT hollendera constantinapproximabilityforppa
AT melissourgost constantinapproximabilityforppa