The freedom to choose: theory and quasi-experimental evidence on cash transfer restrictions

Should cash transfer programmes restrict consumer choice? For example, should food assistance delivered in cash be restricted to food and exclude temptation goods? Theoretically, if transfers are extra-marginal, restrictions induce (1) a substitution effect away from restricted goods and (2) a negat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sterck, O, Siu, J, Rodgers, C
Format: Working paper
Language:English
Published: Centre for the Study of African Economies 2021
_version_ 1826258781417242624
author Sterck, O
Siu, J
Rodgers, C
author_facet Sterck, O
Siu, J
Rodgers, C
author_sort Sterck, O
collection OXFORD
description Should cash transfer programmes restrict consumer choice? For example, should food assistance delivered in cash be restricted to food and exclude temptation goods? Theoretically, if transfers are extra-marginal, restrictions induce (1) a substitution effect away from restricted goods and (2) a negative wealth effect if transfer recipients resell unrestricted goods at a loss to access restricted goods. The welfare impact on transfer recipients is negative. We test and corroborate these predictions by exploiting a natural experiment in a refugee settlement in Kenya, where some refugees receive monthly cash transfers restricted to food while others get unrestricted cash transfers.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T18:39:25Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:0c5facdb-1ee1-42ed-9a7a-4e3bb5577f29
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T18:39:25Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Centre for the Study of African Economies
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:0c5facdb-1ee1-42ed-9a7a-4e3bb5577f292022-03-26T09:34:39ZThe freedom to choose: theory and quasi-experimental evidence on cash transfer restrictionsWorking paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:0c5facdb-1ee1-42ed-9a7a-4e3bb5577f29EnglishSymplectic ElementsCentre for the Study of African Economies2021Sterck, OSiu, JRodgers, CShould cash transfer programmes restrict consumer choice? For example, should food assistance delivered in cash be restricted to food and exclude temptation goods? Theoretically, if transfers are extra-marginal, restrictions induce (1) a substitution effect away from restricted goods and (2) a negative wealth effect if transfer recipients resell unrestricted goods at a loss to access restricted goods. The welfare impact on transfer recipients is negative. We test and corroborate these predictions by exploiting a natural experiment in a refugee settlement in Kenya, where some refugees receive monthly cash transfers restricted to food while others get unrestricted cash transfers.
spellingShingle Sterck, O
Siu, J
Rodgers, C
The freedom to choose: theory and quasi-experimental evidence on cash transfer restrictions
title The freedom to choose: theory and quasi-experimental evidence on cash transfer restrictions
title_full The freedom to choose: theory and quasi-experimental evidence on cash transfer restrictions
title_fullStr The freedom to choose: theory and quasi-experimental evidence on cash transfer restrictions
title_full_unstemmed The freedom to choose: theory and quasi-experimental evidence on cash transfer restrictions
title_short The freedom to choose: theory and quasi-experimental evidence on cash transfer restrictions
title_sort freedom to choose theory and quasi experimental evidence on cash transfer restrictions
work_keys_str_mv AT stercko thefreedomtochoosetheoryandquasiexperimentalevidenceoncashtransferrestrictions
AT siuj thefreedomtochoosetheoryandquasiexperimentalevidenceoncashtransferrestrictions
AT rodgersc thefreedomtochoosetheoryandquasiexperimentalevidenceoncashtransferrestrictions
AT stercko freedomtochoosetheoryandquasiexperimentalevidenceoncashtransferrestrictions
AT siuj freedomtochoosetheoryandquasiexperimentalevidenceoncashtransferrestrictions
AT rodgersc freedomtochoosetheoryandquasiexperimentalevidenceoncashtransferrestrictions