Randomized trials and observational studies: the current philosophical controversy
The supposed superiority of randomized over non-randomized studies is used to justify claims about therapeutic effectiveness of medical interventions and also inclusion criteria for many systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions. However, the view that randomized trials provide better evidence...
Main Authors: | Howick, J, Mebius, A |
---|---|
Outros autores: | Schramme, T |
Formato: | Book section |
Publicado: |
Springer, Dordrecht
2017
|
Títulos similares
-
The philosophical dimension of the christological controversy
por: Zachhuber, J
Publicado: (2021) -
Recent developments and current controversies in depression.
por: Ebmeier, K, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
In search of justification for the unpredictability paradox
por: Howick, J, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Platelet transfusions in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia: conclusions from clinical trials and current controversies
por: Crighton, G, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Positive “framing” as a powerful medication for pain: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
por: Howick, J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)