Commentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018)
In this response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018), we discuss the action‐guidance problem of moral attributes and the risk of superiority illusion in early intervention for psychosis. First, we suggest that guidance documents are not devoid of behavioural recommendations and goals for service prov...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Wiley
2018
|
| _version_ | 1797053576396144640 |
|---|---|
| author | Corsico, P Singh, I |
| author_facet | Corsico, P Singh, I |
| author_sort | Corsico, P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In this response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018), we discuss the action‐guidance problem of moral attributes and the risk of superiority illusion in early intervention for psychosis. First, we suggest that guidance documents are not devoid of behavioural recommendations and goals for service provision, though these are not linked to the ethical dimensions of good practice embedded in the documents. Second, we acknowledge the risk of superiority illusion; we suggest that this risk may be reduced if the ethical and clinical goals of early intervention are presented as interrelated and measurable. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:45:35Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:0e6496e0-0766-413b-bdd4-e37025f2fef0 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:45:35Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:0e6496e0-0766-413b-bdd4-e37025f2fef02022-03-26T09:45:43ZCommentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018)Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:0e6496e0-0766-413b-bdd4-e37025f2fef0Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2018Corsico, PSingh, IIn this response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018), we discuss the action‐guidance problem of moral attributes and the risk of superiority illusion in early intervention for psychosis. First, we suggest that guidance documents are not devoid of behavioural recommendations and goals for service provision, though these are not linked to the ethical dimensions of good practice embedded in the documents. Second, we acknowledge the risk of superiority illusion; we suggest that this risk may be reduced if the ethical and clinical goals of early intervention are presented as interrelated and measurable. |
| spellingShingle | Corsico, P Singh, I Commentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018) |
| title | Commentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018) |
| title_full | Commentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018) |
| title_fullStr | Commentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Commentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018) |
| title_short | Commentary: On action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis: a response to Bortolotti and Jefferson (2018) |
| title_sort | commentary on action guidance and good practice in early intervention for psychosis a response to bortolotti and jefferson 2018 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT corsicop commentaryonactionguidanceandgoodpracticeinearlyinterventionforpsychosisaresponsetobortolottiandjefferson2018 AT singhi commentaryonactionguidanceandgoodpracticeinearlyinterventionforpsychosisaresponsetobortolottiandjefferson2018 |