Physician associate and general practitioner consultations: a comparative observational video study
BACKGROUND: Physician associates, known internationally as physician assistants, are a mid-level practitioner, well established in the United States of America but new to the United Kingdom. A small number work in primary care under the supervision of general practitioners, where they most commonly...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
| _version_ | 1797053955086221312 |
|---|---|
| author | De Lusignan, S McGovern, A Tahir, M Hassan, S Jones, S Halter, M Joly, L Drennan, V |
| author_facet | De Lusignan, S McGovern, A Tahir, M Hassan, S Jones, S Halter, M Joly, L Drennan, V |
| author_sort | De Lusignan, S |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | BACKGROUND: Physician associates, known internationally as physician assistants, are a mid-level practitioner, well established in the United States of America but new to the United Kingdom. A small number work in primary care under the supervision of general practitioners, where they most commonly see patients requesting same day appointments for new problems. As an adjunct to larger study, we investigated the quality of the patient consultation of physician associates in comparison to that of general practitioners. METHOD: We conducted a comparative observational study using video recordings of consultations by volunteer physician associates and general practitioners with consenting patients in single surgery sessions. Recordings were assessed by experienced general practitioners, blinded to the type of the consulting practitioner, using the Leicester Assessment Package. Assessors were asked to comment on the safety of the recorded consultations and to attempt to identify the type of practitioner. Ratings were compared across practitioner type, alongside the number of presenting complaints discussed in each consultation and the number of these which were acute, minor, or regarding a chronic condition. RESULTS: We assessed 62 consultations (41 general practitioner and 21 physician associates) from five general practitioners and four physician associates. All consultations were assessed as safe; but general practitioners were rated higher than PAs in all elements of consultation. The general practitioners were more likely than physician associates to see people with multiple presenting complaints (p<0.0001) and with chronic disease related complaints (p = 0.008). Assessors correctly identified general practitioner consultations but not physician associates. The Leicester Assessment Package had limited inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The physician associate consultations were with a less complex patient group. They were judged as competent and safe, although general practitioner consultations, unsurprisingly, were rated as more competent. Physician associates offer a complementary addition to the medical workforce in general practice. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:50:50Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:1025b5f6-c94f-456c-83ed-b0aefd1160db |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T18:50:50Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:1025b5f6-c94f-456c-83ed-b0aefd1160db2022-03-26T09:54:58ZPhysician associate and general practitioner consultations: a comparative observational video studyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1025b5f6-c94f-456c-83ed-b0aefd1160dbEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2016De Lusignan, SMcGovern, ATahir, MHassan, SJones, SHalter, MJoly, LDrennan, VBACKGROUND: Physician associates, known internationally as physician assistants, are a mid-level practitioner, well established in the United States of America but new to the United Kingdom. A small number work in primary care under the supervision of general practitioners, where they most commonly see patients requesting same day appointments for new problems. As an adjunct to larger study, we investigated the quality of the patient consultation of physician associates in comparison to that of general practitioners. METHOD: We conducted a comparative observational study using video recordings of consultations by volunteer physician associates and general practitioners with consenting patients in single surgery sessions. Recordings were assessed by experienced general practitioners, blinded to the type of the consulting practitioner, using the Leicester Assessment Package. Assessors were asked to comment on the safety of the recorded consultations and to attempt to identify the type of practitioner. Ratings were compared across practitioner type, alongside the number of presenting complaints discussed in each consultation and the number of these which were acute, minor, or regarding a chronic condition. RESULTS: We assessed 62 consultations (41 general practitioner and 21 physician associates) from five general practitioners and four physician associates. All consultations were assessed as safe; but general practitioners were rated higher than PAs in all elements of consultation. The general practitioners were more likely than physician associates to see people with multiple presenting complaints (p<0.0001) and with chronic disease related complaints (p = 0.008). Assessors correctly identified general practitioner consultations but not physician associates. The Leicester Assessment Package had limited inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The physician associate consultations were with a less complex patient group. They were judged as competent and safe, although general practitioner consultations, unsurprisingly, were rated as more competent. Physician associates offer a complementary addition to the medical workforce in general practice. |
| spellingShingle | De Lusignan, S McGovern, A Tahir, M Hassan, S Jones, S Halter, M Joly, L Drennan, V Physician associate and general practitioner consultations: a comparative observational video study |
| title | Physician associate and general practitioner consultations: a comparative observational video study |
| title_full | Physician associate and general practitioner consultations: a comparative observational video study |
| title_fullStr | Physician associate and general practitioner consultations: a comparative observational video study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Physician associate and general practitioner consultations: a comparative observational video study |
| title_short | Physician associate and general practitioner consultations: a comparative observational video study |
| title_sort | physician associate and general practitioner consultations a comparative observational video study |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT delusignans physicianassociateandgeneralpractitionerconsultationsacomparativeobservationalvideostudy AT mcgoverna physicianassociateandgeneralpractitionerconsultationsacomparativeobservationalvideostudy AT tahirm physicianassociateandgeneralpractitionerconsultationsacomparativeobservationalvideostudy AT hassans physicianassociateandgeneralpractitionerconsultationsacomparativeobservationalvideostudy AT joness physicianassociateandgeneralpractitionerconsultationsacomparativeobservationalvideostudy AT halterm physicianassociateandgeneralpractitionerconsultationsacomparativeobservationalvideostudy AT jolyl physicianassociateandgeneralpractitionerconsultationsacomparativeobservationalvideostudy AT drennanv physicianassociateandgeneralpractitionerconsultationsacomparativeobservationalvideostudy |