Immaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestock

This article uses interviews with responsible investment professionals to examine the extent to which institutional equity investors, and specifically ‘universal owners’ with highly diversified shareholdings, engage with public issues associated with livestock agriculture. As share ownership becomes...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Opis bibliograficzny
Główni autorzy: Brice, J, Cusworth, G, Lorimer, J, Garnett, T
Format: Journal article
Język:English
Wydane: SAGE Publications 2022
_version_ 1826310471208140800
author Brice, J
Cusworth, G
Lorimer, J
Garnett, T
author_facet Brice, J
Cusworth, G
Lorimer, J
Garnett, T
author_sort Brice, J
collection OXFORD
description This article uses interviews with responsible investment professionals to examine the extent to which institutional equity investors, and specifically ‘universal owners’ with highly diversified shareholdings, engage with public issues associated with livestock agriculture. As share ownership becomes increasingly concentrated, and the market for Environmental, Social and Governance investment products grows, these investors are increasingly involved in governing the activities of publicly traded corporations (including leading agribusinesses). This paper brings together political economy and marketization studies research to explore how universal owners become concerned about particular environmental and ethical problems, why they overlook other public concerns, and in what ways their selective engagement with ethico-political issues might be altering the content of food politics. Comparing universal owners’ engagements with farm animal welfare issues and with tropical deforestation within animal feed supply chains, we argue that these institutions engage with tropical deforestation because it presents a financially material risk to firms across multiple industries. By contrast, the specificity of farm animal welfare issues to agribusinesses means that they do not pose a material risk to the overall performance of universal owners’ highly diversified asset portfolios. Efforts to concern universal owners about livestock agriculture's social, environmental and health impacts thus generate a food politics which focuses primarily on risks to global economic systems and renders animals themselves distinctly immaterial.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:52:26Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1059e8f0-0315-4dc6-af0e-5c1c3f2b7c63
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:52:26Z
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1059e8f0-0315-4dc6-af0e-5c1c3f2b7c632023-07-27T06:42:28ZImmaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestockJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1059e8f0-0315-4dc6-af0e-5c1c3f2b7c63EnglishSymplectic ElementsSAGE Publications2022Brice, JCusworth, GLorimer, JGarnett, TThis article uses interviews with responsible investment professionals to examine the extent to which institutional equity investors, and specifically ‘universal owners’ with highly diversified shareholdings, engage with public issues associated with livestock agriculture. As share ownership becomes increasingly concentrated, and the market for Environmental, Social and Governance investment products grows, these investors are increasingly involved in governing the activities of publicly traded corporations (including leading agribusinesses). This paper brings together political economy and marketization studies research to explore how universal owners become concerned about particular environmental and ethical problems, why they overlook other public concerns, and in what ways their selective engagement with ethico-political issues might be altering the content of food politics. Comparing universal owners’ engagements with farm animal welfare issues and with tropical deforestation within animal feed supply chains, we argue that these institutions engage with tropical deforestation because it presents a financially material risk to firms across multiple industries. By contrast, the specificity of farm animal welfare issues to agribusinesses means that they do not pose a material risk to the overall performance of universal owners’ highly diversified asset portfolios. Efforts to concern universal owners about livestock agriculture's social, environmental and health impacts thus generate a food politics which focuses primarily on risks to global economic systems and renders animals themselves distinctly immaterial.
spellingShingle Brice, J
Cusworth, G
Lorimer, J
Garnett, T
Immaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestock
title Immaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestock
title_full Immaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestock
title_fullStr Immaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestock
title_full_unstemmed Immaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestock
title_short Immaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestock
title_sort immaterial animals and financialized forests asset manager capitalism esg integration and the politics of livestock
work_keys_str_mv AT bricej immaterialanimalsandfinancializedforestsassetmanagercapitalismesgintegrationandthepoliticsoflivestock
AT cusworthg immaterialanimalsandfinancializedforestsassetmanagercapitalismesgintegrationandthepoliticsoflivestock
AT lorimerj immaterialanimalsandfinancializedforestsassetmanagercapitalismesgintegrationandthepoliticsoflivestock
AT garnettt immaterialanimalsandfinancializedforestsassetmanagercapitalismesgintegrationandthepoliticsoflivestock