Can Regenerative Agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothC

Adopting Regenerative Agriculture (RA) practices on temperate arable land can increase soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration without reducing crop yields. RA is therefore receiving much attention as a climate change mitigation strategy. However, estimating the potential change in national soil car...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jordon, MW, Smith, P, Long, PR, Bürkner, P-C, Petrokofsky, G, Willis, KJ
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022
_version_ 1797106771906527232
author Jordon, MW
Smith, P
Long, PR
Bürkner, P-C
Petrokofsky, G
Willis, KJ
author_facet Jordon, MW
Smith, P
Long, PR
Bürkner, P-C
Petrokofsky, G
Willis, KJ
author_sort Jordon, MW
collection OXFORD
description Adopting Regenerative Agriculture (RA) practices on temperate arable land can increase soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration without reducing crop yields. RA is therefore receiving much attention as a climate change mitigation strategy. However, estimating the potential change in national soil carbon stocks following adoption of RA practices is required to determine its suitability for this. Here, we use a well-validated model of soil carbon turnover (RothC) to simulate adoption of three regenerative practices (cover cropping, reduced tillage intensity and incorporation of a grass-based ley phase into arable rotations) across arable land in Great Britain (GB). We develop a modelling framework which calibrates RothC using studies of these measures from a recent systematic review, estimating the proportional increase in carbon inputs to the soil compared to conventional practice, before simulating adoption across GB. We find that cover cropping would on average increase SOC stocks by 10 t·ha−1 within 30 years of adoption across GB, potentially sequestering 6.5 megatonnes of carbon dioxide per year (MtCO2·y−1). Ley-arable systems could increase SOC stocks by 3 or 16 t·ha−1, potentially providing 2.2 or 10.6 MtCO2·y−1 of sequestration over 30 years, depending on the length of the ley-phase (one and four years, respectively, in these scenarios). In contrast, our modelling approach finds little change in soil carbon stocks when practising reduced tillage intensity. Our results indicate that adopting RA practices could make a meaningful contribution to GB agriculture reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions despite practical constraints to their uptake.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:07:14Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1115047e-a981-4e97-a426-cb9af3c15d54
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:07:14Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1115047e-a981-4e97-a426-cb9af3c15d542022-05-23T08:55:53ZCan Regenerative Agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothCJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1115047e-a981-4e97-a426-cb9af3c15d54EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2022Jordon, MWSmith, PLong, PRBürkner, P-CPetrokofsky, GWillis, KJAdopting Regenerative Agriculture (RA) practices on temperate arable land can increase soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration without reducing crop yields. RA is therefore receiving much attention as a climate change mitigation strategy. However, estimating the potential change in national soil carbon stocks following adoption of RA practices is required to determine its suitability for this. Here, we use a well-validated model of soil carbon turnover (RothC) to simulate adoption of three regenerative practices (cover cropping, reduced tillage intensity and incorporation of a grass-based ley phase into arable rotations) across arable land in Great Britain (GB). We develop a modelling framework which calibrates RothC using studies of these measures from a recent systematic review, estimating the proportional increase in carbon inputs to the soil compared to conventional practice, before simulating adoption across GB. We find that cover cropping would on average increase SOC stocks by 10 t·ha−1 within 30 years of adoption across GB, potentially sequestering 6.5 megatonnes of carbon dioxide per year (MtCO2·y−1). Ley-arable systems could increase SOC stocks by 3 or 16 t·ha−1, potentially providing 2.2 or 10.6 MtCO2·y−1 of sequestration over 30 years, depending on the length of the ley-phase (one and four years, respectively, in these scenarios). In contrast, our modelling approach finds little change in soil carbon stocks when practising reduced tillage intensity. Our results indicate that adopting RA practices could make a meaningful contribution to GB agriculture reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions despite practical constraints to their uptake.
spellingShingle Jordon, MW
Smith, P
Long, PR
Bürkner, P-C
Petrokofsky, G
Willis, KJ
Can Regenerative Agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothC
title Can Regenerative Agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothC
title_full Can Regenerative Agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothC
title_fullStr Can Regenerative Agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothC
title_full_unstemmed Can Regenerative Agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothC
title_short Can Regenerative Agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothC
title_sort can regenerative agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks simulated country scale adoption of reduced tillage cover cropping and ley arable integration using rothc
work_keys_str_mv AT jordonmw canregenerativeagricultureincreasenationalsoilcarbonstockssimulatedcountryscaleadoptionofreducedtillagecovercroppingandleyarableintegrationusingrothc
AT smithp canregenerativeagricultureincreasenationalsoilcarbonstockssimulatedcountryscaleadoptionofreducedtillagecovercroppingandleyarableintegrationusingrothc
AT longpr canregenerativeagricultureincreasenationalsoilcarbonstockssimulatedcountryscaleadoptionofreducedtillagecovercroppingandleyarableintegrationusingrothc
AT burknerpc canregenerativeagricultureincreasenationalsoilcarbonstockssimulatedcountryscaleadoptionofreducedtillagecovercroppingandleyarableintegrationusingrothc
AT petrokofskyg canregenerativeagricultureincreasenationalsoilcarbonstockssimulatedcountryscaleadoptionofreducedtillagecovercroppingandleyarableintegrationusingrothc
AT williskj canregenerativeagricultureincreasenationalsoilcarbonstockssimulatedcountryscaleadoptionofreducedtillagecovercroppingandleyarableintegrationusingrothc