Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have been conducted for all competing interventions. AIM: Evaluation of different methodologies used to indirectly compar...
Main Authors: | Edwards, S, Clarke, M, Wordsworth, S, Borrill, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Similar Items
-
Chlorpromazine for schizophrenia: a Cochrane systematic review of 50 years of randomised controlled trials.
by: Adams, C, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Carbapenems versus other beta-lactams in treating severe infections in intensive care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
by: Edwards, S, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Indirect comparison of interventions using published randomised trials: systematic review of PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction
by: Moore, R, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Finasteride in the treatment of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review of randomised trials
by: Edwards, J, et al.
Published: (2002) -
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of sildenafil (Viagra) in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.
by: Burls, A, et al.
Published: (2001)