Podotimod in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections: a cost-utility analysis

<strong>Introduction<br></strong> Despite the growing evidence on efficacy, few economic evaluations have evaluated the cost-utility of Pidotimod (PDT) supplementation to decrease the probability of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. This study aimed to determine t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buendia Rodriguez, JA, Guerrero Patiño, D, Lindarte, EF
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2022
_version_ 1797110699946672128
author Buendia Rodriguez, JA
Guerrero Patiño, D
Lindarte, EF
author_facet Buendia Rodriguez, JA
Guerrero Patiño, D
Lindarte, EF
author_sort Buendia Rodriguez, JA
collection OXFORD
description <strong>Introduction<br></strong> Despite the growing evidence on efficacy, few economic evaluations have evaluated the cost-utility of Pidotimod (PDT) supplementation to decrease the probability of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. This study aimed to determine the cost-utility of PDT to reduce the incidence rate of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. <br><strong> Methods<br></strong> A decision tree model was used to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of PDT in a patient aged 1–6 with a history of recurrent respiratory tract infections. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) value of US<span>&#36;</span>5180. <br><strong> Results<br></strong> The base-case analysis showed that compared with placebo, PDT was associated with lower costs and higher QALYs. The expected annual cost per patient with PDT was US$797 (CI 95% US<span>&#36;</span>794- US<span>&#36;</span>801) and with placebo was US<span>&#36;</span>1175 (CI 95% US<span>&#36;</span>1169- US<span>&#36;</span>1181). The QALYs per person estimated with PDT was 0.95 (CI 95% 0.94–0.95) and with placebo was 0.94 (CI 95% 0.94–0.94). The NMB with PDT was US<span>&#36;</span> 4121 (CI 95% 4114–4127) and with placebo was US<span>&#36;</span> 3710 (CI 95% 3700–3720). This position of absolute dominance (PDT has lower costs and higher QALYs than placebo) of PDT it is unnecessary to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. <br><strong> Conclusion<br></strong> In conclusion our study shows that PDT is a cost-effective strategy to reduce the incidence rate of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. Our study provides evidence that should be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:59:58Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1271ffa4-ea4a-42b9-bee2-c9999196f514
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:59:58Z
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1271ffa4-ea4a-42b9-bee2-c9999196f5142023-09-19T10:49:50ZPodotimod in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections: a cost-utility analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1271ffa4-ea4a-42b9-bee2-c9999196f514EnglishSymplectic ElementsBioMed Central2022Buendia Rodriguez, JAGuerrero Patiño, DLindarte, EF<strong>Introduction<br></strong> Despite the growing evidence on efficacy, few economic evaluations have evaluated the cost-utility of Pidotimod (PDT) supplementation to decrease the probability of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. This study aimed to determine the cost-utility of PDT to reduce the incidence rate of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. <br><strong> Methods<br></strong> A decision tree model was used to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of PDT in a patient aged 1–6 with a history of recurrent respiratory tract infections. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) value of US<span>&#36;</span>5180. <br><strong> Results<br></strong> The base-case analysis showed that compared with placebo, PDT was associated with lower costs and higher QALYs. The expected annual cost per patient with PDT was US$797 (CI 95% US<span>&#36;</span>794- US<span>&#36;</span>801) and with placebo was US<span>&#36;</span>1175 (CI 95% US<span>&#36;</span>1169- US<span>&#36;</span>1181). The QALYs per person estimated with PDT was 0.95 (CI 95% 0.94–0.95) and with placebo was 0.94 (CI 95% 0.94–0.94). The NMB with PDT was US<span>&#36;</span> 4121 (CI 95% 4114–4127) and with placebo was US<span>&#36;</span> 3710 (CI 95% 3700–3720). This position of absolute dominance (PDT has lower costs and higher QALYs than placebo) of PDT it is unnecessary to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. <br><strong> Conclusion<br></strong> In conclusion our study shows that PDT is a cost-effective strategy to reduce the incidence rate of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. Our study provides evidence that should be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines.
spellingShingle Buendia Rodriguez, JA
Guerrero Patiño, D
Lindarte, EF
Podotimod in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections: a cost-utility analysis
title Podotimod in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections: a cost-utility analysis
title_full Podotimod in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections: a cost-utility analysis
title_fullStr Podotimod in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections: a cost-utility analysis
title_full_unstemmed Podotimod in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections: a cost-utility analysis
title_short Podotimod in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections: a cost-utility analysis
title_sort podotimod in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections a cost utility analysis
work_keys_str_mv AT buendiarodriguezja podotimodinpediatricrecurrentrespiratorytractinfectionsacostutilityanalysis
AT guerreropatinod podotimodinpediatricrecurrentrespiratorytractinfectionsacostutilityanalysis
AT lindarteef podotimodinpediatricrecurrentrespiratorytractinfectionsacostutilityanalysis