What do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary tale

In studies of educational achievement, students’ self-reported number of books in the family home is a frequently used proxy for social, cultural, and economic background. Absent hard evidence about what this variable captures or how well, its use has been motivated by strong associations with stude...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Engzell, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2019
_version_ 1797108750728822784
author Engzell, P
author_facet Engzell, P
author_sort Engzell, P
collection OXFORD
description In studies of educational achievement, students’ self-reported number of books in the family home is a frequently used proxy for social, cultural, and economic background. Absent hard evidence about what this variable captures or how well, its use has been motivated by strong associations with student outcomes. I show that these associations rest on two types of endogeneity: Low achievers accrue fewer books and are also prone to underestimate their number. The conclusion is substantiated both by comparing reports by students and their parents and by the fact that girls report on average higher numbers despite being similar to boys on other measures of social background. The endogenous bias is large enough to overturn classical attenuation bias; it distorts cross-country patterns and invalidates many common study designs. These findings serve as a caution against overreliance on standard regression assumptions and contribute to ongoing debates about the empirical robustness of social science.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:32:52Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:12dd933a-b476-4d52-879a-4f7b4b7be89a
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:32:52Z
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:12dd933a-b476-4d52-879a-4f7b4b7be89a2023-02-09T12:46:55ZWhat do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary taleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:12dd933a-b476-4d52-879a-4f7b4b7be89aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2019Engzell, PIn studies of educational achievement, students’ self-reported number of books in the family home is a frequently used proxy for social, cultural, and economic background. Absent hard evidence about what this variable captures or how well, its use has been motivated by strong associations with student outcomes. I show that these associations rest on two types of endogeneity: Low achievers accrue fewer books and are also prone to underestimate their number. The conclusion is substantiated both by comparing reports by students and their parents and by the fact that girls report on average higher numbers despite being similar to boys on other measures of social background. The endogenous bias is large enough to overturn classical attenuation bias; it distorts cross-country patterns and invalidates many common study designs. These findings serve as a caution against overreliance on standard regression assumptions and contribute to ongoing debates about the empirical robustness of social science.
spellingShingle Engzell, P
What do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary tale
title What do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary tale
title_full What do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary tale
title_fullStr What do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary tale
title_full_unstemmed What do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary tale
title_short What do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary tale
title_sort what do books in the home proxy for a cautionary tale
work_keys_str_mv AT engzellp whatdobooksinthehomeproxyforacautionarytale