THE RISE OF DEFERENCE: THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND DECENTRALIZED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EU FREE MOVEMENT LAW

An institution erstwhile known for its activism, the ECJ has, in recent years, rendered a growing number of judgments marked by caution, especially when reviewing Member State acts. Through doctrines such as the margin of appreciation, the Court has granted national authorities substantial deference...

Cijeli opis

Bibliografski detalji
Glavni autor: Zglinski, J
Format: Journal article
Izdano: Kluwer Law International 2018
_version_ 1826260118682992640
author Zglinski, J
author_facet Zglinski, J
author_sort Zglinski, J
collection OXFORD
description An institution erstwhile known for its activism, the ECJ has, in recent years, rendered a growing number of judgments marked by caution, especially when reviewing Member State acts. Through doctrines such as the margin of appreciation, the Court has granted national authorities substantial deference. This article investigates how and when the Court defers to the Member States. It focuses on free movement adjudication and, more specifically, on the way in which the ECJ conducts justification and proportionality review. Drawing on an empirical study of free movement case law (1974-2013), it is argued that an important shift has taken place in EU law: the ECJ is scaling down its control over Member State measures and increasingly delegates decision-making tasks to national institutions, both political and judicial.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:00:34Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:13625ead-dec7-4ec2-914f-fb417a81a3af
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:00:34Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Kluwer Law International
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:13625ead-dec7-4ec2-914f-fb417a81a3af2022-03-26T10:13:35ZTHE RISE OF DEFERENCE: THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND DECENTRALIZED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EU FREE MOVEMENT LAWJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:13625ead-dec7-4ec2-914f-fb417a81a3afSymplectic Elements at OxfordKluwer Law International2018Zglinski, JAn institution erstwhile known for its activism, the ECJ has, in recent years, rendered a growing number of judgments marked by caution, especially when reviewing Member State acts. Through doctrines such as the margin of appreciation, the Court has granted national authorities substantial deference. This article investigates how and when the Court defers to the Member States. It focuses on free movement adjudication and, more specifically, on the way in which the ECJ conducts justification and proportionality review. Drawing on an empirical study of free movement case law (1974-2013), it is argued that an important shift has taken place in EU law: the ECJ is scaling down its control over Member State measures and increasingly delegates decision-making tasks to national institutions, both political and judicial.
spellingShingle Zglinski, J
THE RISE OF DEFERENCE: THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND DECENTRALIZED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EU FREE MOVEMENT LAW
title THE RISE OF DEFERENCE: THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND DECENTRALIZED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EU FREE MOVEMENT LAW
title_full THE RISE OF DEFERENCE: THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND DECENTRALIZED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EU FREE MOVEMENT LAW
title_fullStr THE RISE OF DEFERENCE: THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND DECENTRALIZED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EU FREE MOVEMENT LAW
title_full_unstemmed THE RISE OF DEFERENCE: THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND DECENTRALIZED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EU FREE MOVEMENT LAW
title_short THE RISE OF DEFERENCE: THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND DECENTRALIZED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EU FREE MOVEMENT LAW
title_sort rise of deference the margin of appreciation and decentralized judicial review in eu free movement law
work_keys_str_mv AT zglinskij theriseofdeferencethemarginofappreciationanddecentralizedjudicialreviewineufreemovementlaw
AT zglinskij riseofdeferencethemarginofappreciationanddecentralizedjudicialreviewineufreemovementlaw