The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola Outbreak

Online participation in research is used increasingly to recruit geographically dispersed populations. Obtaining online consent is convenient, yet we know little about the acceptability of this practice. We carried out a serostudy among personnel returning to the UK/Ireland following deployment to W...

Celý popis

Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autoři: McGowan, CR, Houlihan, CF, Kingori, P, Glynn, JR
Médium: Journal article
Jazyk:English
Vydáno: Oxford University Press 2017
_version_ 1826260127694454784
author McGowan, CR
Houlihan, CF
Kingori, P
Glynn, JR
author_facet McGowan, CR
Houlihan, CF
Kingori, P
Glynn, JR
author_sort McGowan, CR
collection OXFORD
description Online participation in research is used increasingly to recruit geographically dispersed populations. Obtaining online consent is convenient, yet we know little about the acceptability of this practice. We carried out a serostudy among personnel returning to the UK/Ireland following deployment to West Africa during the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic. We used an online procedure for consenting returnees and designed a small descriptive study to understand: how much of the consent material they read, how informed they felt and if they preferred online to traditional face-to-face consent. Of 261 returnees, 111 (43 per cent) completed the consent survey. Participants indicated a high level of engagement with the consent materials, with 67 per cent reporting having read all and 20 per cent having read 'most' of the materials. All participants indicated feeling completely (78 per cent) or mostly (22 per cent) informed about the purpose, methods and intended uses of the research, as well as what participation was required and what risks were involved. Only three participants indicated a preference for face-to-face consent. Free-text comments suggested that online consent may be an acceptable modality for uncomplicated and low-risk studies. The study sample was largely composed of health professionals, suggesting acceptability of online consent within this population.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:00:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:136da19b-9511-433a-a84a-b8da5f4cd485
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:00:43Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:136da19b-9511-433a-a84a-b8da5f4cd4852022-03-26T10:13:49ZThe Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola OutbreakJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:136da19b-9511-433a-a84a-b8da5f4cd485EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordOxford University Press2017McGowan, CRHoulihan, CFKingori, PGlynn, JROnline participation in research is used increasingly to recruit geographically dispersed populations. Obtaining online consent is convenient, yet we know little about the acceptability of this practice. We carried out a serostudy among personnel returning to the UK/Ireland following deployment to West Africa during the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic. We used an online procedure for consenting returnees and designed a small descriptive study to understand: how much of the consent material they read, how informed they felt and if they preferred online to traditional face-to-face consent. Of 261 returnees, 111 (43 per cent) completed the consent survey. Participants indicated a high level of engagement with the consent materials, with 67 per cent reporting having read all and 20 per cent having read 'most' of the materials. All participants indicated feeling completely (78 per cent) or mostly (22 per cent) informed about the purpose, methods and intended uses of the research, as well as what participation was required and what risks were involved. Only three participants indicated a preference for face-to-face consent. Free-text comments suggested that online consent may be an acceptable modality for uncomplicated and low-risk studies. The study sample was largely composed of health professionals, suggesting acceptability of online consent within this population.
spellingShingle McGowan, CR
Houlihan, CF
Kingori, P
Glynn, JR
The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola Outbreak
title The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola Outbreak
title_full The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola Outbreak
title_fullStr The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola Outbreak
title_full_unstemmed The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola Outbreak
title_short The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola Outbreak
title_sort acceptability of online consent in a self test serosurvey of responders to the 2014 2016 west african ebola outbreak
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgowancr theacceptabilityofonlineconsentinaselftestserosurveyofresponderstothe20142016westafricanebolaoutbreak
AT houlihancf theacceptabilityofonlineconsentinaselftestserosurveyofresponderstothe20142016westafricanebolaoutbreak
AT kingorip theacceptabilityofonlineconsentinaselftestserosurveyofresponderstothe20142016westafricanebolaoutbreak
AT glynnjr theacceptabilityofonlineconsentinaselftestserosurveyofresponderstothe20142016westafricanebolaoutbreak
AT mcgowancr acceptabilityofonlineconsentinaselftestserosurveyofresponderstothe20142016westafricanebolaoutbreak
AT houlihancf acceptabilityofonlineconsentinaselftestserosurveyofresponderstothe20142016westafricanebolaoutbreak
AT kingorip acceptabilityofonlineconsentinaselftestserosurveyofresponderstothe20142016westafricanebolaoutbreak
AT glynnjr acceptabilityofonlineconsentinaselftestserosurveyofresponderstothe20142016westafricanebolaoutbreak