Prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis is increased in high bone mass.

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological studies have shown an association between increased bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoarthritis (OA), but whether this represents cause or effect remains unclear. In this study, we used a novel approach to investigate this question, determining whether individuals with H...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar: Hardcastle, SA, Dieppe, P, Gregson, C, Hunter, D, Thomas, G, Arden, N, Spector, T, Hart, D, Laugharne, M, Clague, G, Edwards, M, Dennison, E, Cooper, C, Williams, M, Davey Smith, G, Tobias, J
Materyal Türü: Journal article
Dil:English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Elsevier 2014
_version_ 1826260201828777984
author Hardcastle, SA
Dieppe, P
Gregson, C
Hunter, D
Thomas, G
Arden, N
Spector, T
Hart, D
Laugharne, M
Clague, G
Edwards, M
Dennison, E
Cooper, C
Williams, M
Davey Smith, G
Tobias, J
author_facet Hardcastle, SA
Dieppe, P
Gregson, C
Hunter, D
Thomas, G
Arden, N
Spector, T
Hart, D
Laugharne, M
Clague, G
Edwards, M
Dennison, E
Cooper, C
Williams, M
Davey Smith, G
Tobias, J
author_sort Hardcastle, SA
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological studies have shown an association between increased bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoarthritis (OA), but whether this represents cause or effect remains unclear. In this study, we used a novel approach to investigate this question, determining whether individuals with High Bone Mass (HBM) have a higher prevalence of radiographic hip OA compared with controls. DESIGN: HBM cases came from the UK-based HBM study: HBM was defined by BMD Z-score. Unaffected relatives of index cases were recruited as family controls. Age-stratified random sampling was used to select further population controls from the Chingford and Hertfordshire cohort studies. Pelvic radiographs were pooled and assessed by a single observer blinded to case-control status. Analyses used logistic regression, adjusted for age, gender and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: 530 HBM hips in 272 cases (mean age 62.9 years, 74% female) and 1702 control hips in 863 controls (mean age 64.8 years, 84% female) were analysed. The prevalence of radiographic OA, defined as Croft score ≥3, was higher in cases compared with controls (20.0% vs 13.6%), with adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] 1.52 [1.09, 2.11], P = 0.013. Osteophytes (OR 2.12 [1.61, 2.79], P < 0.001) and subchondral sclerosis (OR 2.78 [1.49, 5.18], P = 0.001) were more prevalent in cases. However, no difference in the prevalence of joint space narrowing (JSN) was seen (OR 0.97 [0.72, 1.33], P = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: An increased prevalence of radiographic hip OA and osteophytosis was observed in HBM cases compared with controls, in keeping with a positive association between HBM and OA and suggesting that OA in HBM has a hypertrophic phenotype.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:01:53Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:13d3d0fa-ce07-4a9e-8d3c-8b91b22e627d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:01:53Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:13d3d0fa-ce07-4a9e-8d3c-8b91b22e627d2022-03-26T10:16:02ZPrevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis is increased in high bone mass.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:13d3d0fa-ce07-4a9e-8d3c-8b91b22e627dEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2014Hardcastle, SADieppe, PGregson, CHunter, DThomas, GArden, NSpector, THart, DLaugharne, MClague, GEdwards, MDennison, ECooper, CWilliams, MDavey Smith, GTobias, JOBJECTIVE: Epidemiological studies have shown an association between increased bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoarthritis (OA), but whether this represents cause or effect remains unclear. In this study, we used a novel approach to investigate this question, determining whether individuals with High Bone Mass (HBM) have a higher prevalence of radiographic hip OA compared with controls. DESIGN: HBM cases came from the UK-based HBM study: HBM was defined by BMD Z-score. Unaffected relatives of index cases were recruited as family controls. Age-stratified random sampling was used to select further population controls from the Chingford and Hertfordshire cohort studies. Pelvic radiographs were pooled and assessed by a single observer blinded to case-control status. Analyses used logistic regression, adjusted for age, gender and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: 530 HBM hips in 272 cases (mean age 62.9 years, 74% female) and 1702 control hips in 863 controls (mean age 64.8 years, 84% female) were analysed. The prevalence of radiographic OA, defined as Croft score ≥3, was higher in cases compared with controls (20.0% vs 13.6%), with adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] 1.52 [1.09, 2.11], P = 0.013. Osteophytes (OR 2.12 [1.61, 2.79], P < 0.001) and subchondral sclerosis (OR 2.78 [1.49, 5.18], P = 0.001) were more prevalent in cases. However, no difference in the prevalence of joint space narrowing (JSN) was seen (OR 0.97 [0.72, 1.33], P = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: An increased prevalence of radiographic hip OA and osteophytosis was observed in HBM cases compared with controls, in keeping with a positive association between HBM and OA and suggesting that OA in HBM has a hypertrophic phenotype.
spellingShingle Hardcastle, SA
Dieppe, P
Gregson, C
Hunter, D
Thomas, G
Arden, N
Spector, T
Hart, D
Laugharne, M
Clague, G
Edwards, M
Dennison, E
Cooper, C
Williams, M
Davey Smith, G
Tobias, J
Prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis is increased in high bone mass.
title Prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis is increased in high bone mass.
title_full Prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis is increased in high bone mass.
title_fullStr Prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis is increased in high bone mass.
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis is increased in high bone mass.
title_short Prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis is increased in high bone mass.
title_sort prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis is increased in high bone mass
work_keys_str_mv AT hardcastlesa prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT dieppep prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT gregsonc prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT hunterd prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT thomasg prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT ardenn prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT spectort prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT hartd prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT laugharnem prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT clagueg prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT edwardsm prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT dennisone prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT cooperc prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT williamsm prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT daveysmithg prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass
AT tobiasj prevalenceofradiographichiposteoarthritisisincreasedinhighbonemass