The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - II. Structure and evolution at high redshift

We present a clustering analysis of QSOs over the redshift range z=0.3-2.9. We use a sample of 10558 QSOs taken from the preliminary catalogue of the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ). The two-point redshift-space correlation function of QSOs is shown to follow a power law on scales s~1-35h-1Mpc. Fittin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Croom, S, Shanks, T, Boyle, B, Smith, R, Miller, L, Loaring, N, Hoyle, F
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2000
_version_ 1797054803492208640
author Croom, S
Shanks, T
Boyle, B
Smith, R
Miller, L
Loaring, N
Hoyle, F
author_facet Croom, S
Shanks, T
Boyle, B
Smith, R
Miller, L
Loaring, N
Hoyle, F
author_sort Croom, S
collection OXFORD
description We present a clustering analysis of QSOs over the redshift range z=0.3-2.9. We use a sample of 10558 QSOs taken from the preliminary catalogue of the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ). The two-point redshift-space correlation function of QSOs is shown to follow a power law on scales s~1-35h-1Mpc. Fitting a power law to QSO clustering averaged over the redshift interval 0.3<z<2.9 (eds).="" (rejected="" 2qz.="" a="" although="" an="" and="" apply,="" are="" as="" at="" best="" clustering="" comoving="" comparable="" coordinates="" cosmology="" does="" eds="" einstein-de="" evolution="" extends="" find="" fit="" follow="" for="" function="" galaxies.="" gamma="1.56+0.10-0.09." gravitational="" growth="" high="" in="" increase="" instability="" is="" lambda_0="0.7" large="" law="" linear="" local="" marginal="" mean="" measure="" measured="" no="" not="" of="" omega_0="0.3" on="" optically="" over="" power="" predictions="" qso="" qsos="" range="" redshift="" redshift.="" s_0="5.69+0.42-0.50h-1Mpc" scales="" selected="" should="" shows="" sitter="" s~60h-1mpc="" the="" theory="" there="" these="" to="" values,="" via="" we="" where="" with="" z="1.49,">99 per cent confidence level). A redshift dependent bias is required to reconcile QSO clustering observations with theory. A simple biasing model, in which QSOs have cosmologically long lifetimes (or alternatively form in peaks above a constant threshold in the density field) is acceptable in an EdS cosmology, but is only marginally acceptable if Omega_0=0.3 and lambda_0=0.7. Biasing models which assume QSOs form over a range in redshift, based on the Press-Schechter formalism are approximately consistent with QSO clustering evolution (abridged).</z<2.9>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:02:24Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:13fb621f-b767-4b05-bf19-c60f4ff84394
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:02:24Z
publishDate 2000
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:13fb621f-b767-4b05-bf19-c60f4ff843942022-03-26T10:16:59ZThe 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - II. Structure and evolution at high redshiftJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:13fb621f-b767-4b05-bf19-c60f4ff84394EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2000Croom, SShanks, TBoyle, BSmith, RMiller, LLoaring, NHoyle, FWe present a clustering analysis of QSOs over the redshift range z=0.3-2.9. We use a sample of 10558 QSOs taken from the preliminary catalogue of the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey (2QZ). The two-point redshift-space correlation function of QSOs is shown to follow a power law on scales s~1-35h-1Mpc. Fitting a power law to QSO clustering averaged over the redshift interval 0.3<z<2.9 (eds).="" (rejected="" 2qz.="" a="" although="" an="" and="" apply,="" are="" as="" at="" best="" clustering="" comoving="" comparable="" coordinates="" cosmology="" does="" eds="" einstein-de="" evolution="" extends="" find="" fit="" follow="" for="" function="" galaxies.="" gamma="1.56+0.10-0.09." gravitational="" growth="" high="" in="" increase="" instability="" is="" lambda_0="0.7" large="" law="" linear="" local="" marginal="" mean="" measure="" measured="" no="" not="" of="" omega_0="0.3" on="" optically="" over="" power="" predictions="" qso="" qsos="" range="" redshift="" redshift.="" s_0="5.69+0.42-0.50h-1Mpc" scales="" selected="" should="" shows="" sitter="" s~60h-1mpc="" the="" theory="" there="" these="" to="" values,="" via="" we="" where="" with="" z="1.49,">99 per cent confidence level). A redshift dependent bias is required to reconcile QSO clustering observations with theory. A simple biasing model, in which QSOs have cosmologically long lifetimes (or alternatively form in peaks above a constant threshold in the density field) is acceptable in an EdS cosmology, but is only marginally acceptable if Omega_0=0.3 and lambda_0=0.7. Biasing models which assume QSOs form over a range in redshift, based on the Press-Schechter formalism are approximately consistent with QSO clustering evolution (abridged).</z<2.9>
spellingShingle Croom, S
Shanks, T
Boyle, B
Smith, R
Miller, L
Loaring, N
Hoyle, F
The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - II. Structure and evolution at high redshift
title The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - II. Structure and evolution at high redshift
title_full The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - II. Structure and evolution at high redshift
title_fullStr The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - II. Structure and evolution at high redshift
title_full_unstemmed The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - II. Structure and evolution at high redshift
title_short The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - II. Structure and evolution at high redshift
title_sort 2df qso redshift survey ii structure and evolution at high redshift
work_keys_str_mv AT crooms the2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT shankst the2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT boyleb the2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT smithr the2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT millerl the2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT loaringn the2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT hoylef the2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT crooms 2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT shankst 2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT boyleb 2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT smithr 2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT millerl 2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT loaringn 2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift
AT hoylef 2dfqsoredshiftsurveyiistructureandevolutionathighredshift