Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy
<h4>Introduction</h4> <p>A classification framework for posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is proposed to improve the uniformity of definition of the syndrome in a variety of research settings.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>Consensus statements about PCAwere develo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017
|
_version_ | 1826260262748946432 |
---|---|
author | Crutch, S Schott, J Rabinovici, G Murray, M Snowden, J , v Dickerson, B Vandenberghe, R Ahmed, S Bak, T Boeve, B Butler, C Cappa, S Ceccaldi, M de Souza, L Dubois, B Felician, O Galasko, D Graff-Radford, J Graff-Radford, N Hof, P Krolak-Salmon, P Lehmann, M Magnin, E Mendez, M Nestor, P Onyike, C Pelak, V Pijnenburg, Y Primativo, S Rossor, M Ryan, N Scheltens, P Shakespeare, T Suárez González, A Tang-Wai, D Yong, K Carrillo, M Fox, N |
author_facet | Crutch, S Schott, J Rabinovici, G Murray, M Snowden, J , v Dickerson, B Vandenberghe, R Ahmed, S Bak, T Boeve, B Butler, C Cappa, S Ceccaldi, M de Souza, L Dubois, B Felician, O Galasko, D Graff-Radford, J Graff-Radford, N Hof, P Krolak-Salmon, P Lehmann, M Magnin, E Mendez, M Nestor, P Onyike, C Pelak, V Pijnenburg, Y Primativo, S Rossor, M Ryan, N Scheltens, P Shakespeare, T Suárez González, A Tang-Wai, D Yong, K Carrillo, M Fox, N |
author_sort | Crutch, S |
collection | OXFORD |
description | <h4>Introduction</h4> <p>A classification framework for posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is proposed to improve the uniformity of definition of the syndrome in a variety of research settings.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>Consensus statements about PCAwere developed through a detailed literature review, the formation of an international multidisciplinary working party which convened on four occasions, and a Web-based quantitative survey regarding symptom frequency and the conceptualization of PCA.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>A three-level classification framework for PCA is described comprising both syndromeand disease-level descriptions. Classification level 1 (PCA) defines the core clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging features and exclusion criteria of the clinico-radiological syndrome. Classification level 2 (PCA-pure, PCA-plus) establishes whether, in addition to the core PCA syndrome, the core features of any other neurodegenerative syndromes are present. Classification level 3 (PCA attributable to AD [PCA-AD], Lewy body disease [PCA-LBD], corticobasal degeneration [PCA-CBD], prion disease [PCA-prion]) provides a more formal determination of the underlying cause of the PCA syndrome, based on available pathophysiological biomarker evidence. The issue of additional syndrome-level descriptors is discussed in relation to the challenges of defining stages of syndrome severity and characterizing phenotypic heterogeneity within the PCA spectrum.</p> <h4>Discussion</h4> <p>There was strong agreement regarding the definition of the core clinico-radiological syndrome, meaning that the current consensus statement should be regarded as a refinement, development, and extension of previous single-center PCA criteria rather than any wholesale alteration or redescription of the syndrome. The framework and terminology may facilitate the interpretation of research data across studies, be applicable across a broad range of research scenarios (e.g., behavioral interventions, pharmacological trials), and provide a foundation for future collaborative work.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:02:53Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:1426a133-8096-4a7c-bba0-af963c63d60a |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:02:53Z |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:1426a133-8096-4a7c-bba0-af963c63d60a2022-03-26T10:18:03ZConsensus classification of posterior cortical atrophyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1426a133-8096-4a7c-bba0-af963c63d60aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2017Crutch, SSchott, JRabinovici, GMurray, MSnowden, J, vDickerson, BVandenberghe, RAhmed, SBak, TBoeve, BButler, CCappa, SCeccaldi, Mde Souza, LDubois, BFelician, OGalasko, DGraff-Radford, JGraff-Radford, NHof, PKrolak-Salmon, PLehmann, MMagnin, EMendez, MNestor, POnyike, CPelak, VPijnenburg, YPrimativo, SRossor, MRyan, NScheltens, PShakespeare, TSuárez González, ATang-Wai, DYong, KCarrillo, MFox, N <h4>Introduction</h4> <p>A classification framework for posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is proposed to improve the uniformity of definition of the syndrome in a variety of research settings.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>Consensus statements about PCAwere developed through a detailed literature review, the formation of an international multidisciplinary working party which convened on four occasions, and a Web-based quantitative survey regarding symptom frequency and the conceptualization of PCA.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>A three-level classification framework for PCA is described comprising both syndromeand disease-level descriptions. Classification level 1 (PCA) defines the core clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging features and exclusion criteria of the clinico-radiological syndrome. Classification level 2 (PCA-pure, PCA-plus) establishes whether, in addition to the core PCA syndrome, the core features of any other neurodegenerative syndromes are present. Classification level 3 (PCA attributable to AD [PCA-AD], Lewy body disease [PCA-LBD], corticobasal degeneration [PCA-CBD], prion disease [PCA-prion]) provides a more formal determination of the underlying cause of the PCA syndrome, based on available pathophysiological biomarker evidence. The issue of additional syndrome-level descriptors is discussed in relation to the challenges of defining stages of syndrome severity and characterizing phenotypic heterogeneity within the PCA spectrum.</p> <h4>Discussion</h4> <p>There was strong agreement regarding the definition of the core clinico-radiological syndrome, meaning that the current consensus statement should be regarded as a refinement, development, and extension of previous single-center PCA criteria rather than any wholesale alteration or redescription of the syndrome. The framework and terminology may facilitate the interpretation of research data across studies, be applicable across a broad range of research scenarios (e.g., behavioral interventions, pharmacological trials), and provide a foundation for future collaborative work.</p> |
spellingShingle | Crutch, S Schott, J Rabinovici, G Murray, M Snowden, J , v Dickerson, B Vandenberghe, R Ahmed, S Bak, T Boeve, B Butler, C Cappa, S Ceccaldi, M de Souza, L Dubois, B Felician, O Galasko, D Graff-Radford, J Graff-Radford, N Hof, P Krolak-Salmon, P Lehmann, M Magnin, E Mendez, M Nestor, P Onyike, C Pelak, V Pijnenburg, Y Primativo, S Rossor, M Ryan, N Scheltens, P Shakespeare, T Suárez González, A Tang-Wai, D Yong, K Carrillo, M Fox, N Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy |
title | Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy |
title_full | Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy |
title_fullStr | Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy |
title_short | Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy |
title_sort | consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crutchs consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT schottj consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT rabinovicig consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT murraym consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT snowdenj consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT v consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT dickersonb consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT vandenbergher consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT ahmeds consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT bakt consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT boeveb consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT butlerc consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT cappas consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT ceccaldim consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT desouzal consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT duboisb consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT feliciano consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT galaskod consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT graffradfordj consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT graffradfordn consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT hofp consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT krolaksalmonp consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT lehmannm consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT magnine consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT mendezm consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT nestorp consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT onyikec consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT pelakv consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT pijnenburgy consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT primativos consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT rossorm consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT ryann consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT scheltensp consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT shakespearet consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT suarezgonzaleza consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT tangwaid consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT yongk consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT carrillom consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy AT foxn consensusclassificationofposteriorcorticalatrophy |