Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework

Widely varying accounts of how people categorize new instances have been advanced in recent years. It is argued that identification and evaluation of a product are fundamentally intertwined and are outcomes of a process intended both to provide meaning and to facilitate a readiness to respond. The v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Basu, K, Cohen, J
Format: Journal article
Published: 1987
_version_ 1797054878083710976
author Basu, K
Cohen, J
author_facet Basu, K
Cohen, J
author_sort Basu, K
collection OXFORD
description Widely varying accounts of how people categorize new instances have been advanced in recent years. It is argued that identification and evaluation of a product are fundamentally intertwined and are outcomes of a process intended both to provide meaning and to facilitate a readiness to respond. The various alternative models of the categorization process are reviewed with an emphasis on the use of concrete category exemplars as opposed to category-defining rules and prototypes (feature-based processes). A contingency-based ''mixed model'' is presented that incorporates the effects of category learning and task-related factors likely to be important in categorization occurrences similar to those faced by consumers. This contingency processing formulation stresses the flexibility of the information processing system in its response to important contextual factors. Finally, research paradigms are introduced that are designed to examine the effects of contingent processing factors on the categorization processes used by the individual.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:03:29Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1456d2ab-b252-47a1-84cb-7d62d0a22a3d
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:03:29Z
publishDate 1987
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1456d2ab-b252-47a1-84cb-7d62d0a22a3d2022-03-26T10:19:16ZAlternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing FrameworkJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1456d2ab-b252-47a1-84cb-7d62d0a22a3dSaïd Business School - Eureka1987Basu, KCohen, JWidely varying accounts of how people categorize new instances have been advanced in recent years. It is argued that identification and evaluation of a product are fundamentally intertwined and are outcomes of a process intended both to provide meaning and to facilitate a readiness to respond. The various alternative models of the categorization process are reviewed with an emphasis on the use of concrete category exemplars as opposed to category-defining rules and prototypes (feature-based processes). A contingency-based ''mixed model'' is presented that incorporates the effects of category learning and task-related factors likely to be important in categorization occurrences similar to those faced by consumers. This contingency processing formulation stresses the flexibility of the information processing system in its response to important contextual factors. Finally, research paradigms are introduced that are designed to examine the effects of contingent processing factors on the categorization processes used by the individual.
spellingShingle Basu, K
Cohen, J
Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework
title Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework
title_full Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework
title_fullStr Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework
title_full_unstemmed Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework
title_short Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework
title_sort alternative models of categorization toward a contingent processing framework
work_keys_str_mv AT basuk alternativemodelsofcategorizationtowardacontingentprocessingframework
AT cohenj alternativemodelsofcategorizationtowardacontingentprocessingframework