Variance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessions

Here we report an exploratory within-subject variance decomposition analysis conducted on a task-based fMRI dataset with an unusually large number of repeated measures (i.e., 500 trials in each of three different subjects) distributed across 100 functional scans and 9 to 10 different sessions. Withi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonzalez-Castillo, J, Chen, G, Nichols, T, Bandettini, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016
_version_ 1797054922632462336
author Gonzalez-Castillo, J
Chen, G
Nichols, T
Bandettini, P
author_facet Gonzalez-Castillo, J
Chen, G
Nichols, T
Bandettini, P
author_sort Gonzalez-Castillo, J
collection OXFORD
description Here we report an exploratory within-subject variance decomposition analysis conducted on a task-based fMRI dataset with an unusually large number of repeated measures (i.e., 500 trials in each of three different subjects) distributed across 100 functional scans and 9 to 10 different sessions. Within-subject variance was segregated into four primary components: variance across-sessions, variance across-runs within a session, variance across-blocks within a run, and residual measurement/modeling error. Our results reveal inhomogeneous and distinct spatial distributions of these variance components across significantly active voxels in grey matter. Measurement error is dominant across the whole brain. Detailed evaluation of the remaining three components shows that across-session variance is the second largest contributor to total variance in occipital cortex, while across-runs variance is the second dominant source for the rest of the brain. Network-specific analysis revealed that across-block variance contributes more to total variance in higher-order cognitive networks than in somatosensory cortex. Moreover, in some higher-order cognitive networks across-block variance can exceed across-session variance. These results help us better understand the temporal (i.e., across blocks, runs and sessions) and spatial distributions (i.e., across different networks) of within-subject natural variability in estimates of task responses in fMRI. They also suggest that different brain regions will show different natural levels of test-retest reliability even in the absence of residual artifacts and sufficiently high contrast-to-noise measurements. Further confirmation with a larger sample of subjects and other tasks is necessary to ensure generality of these results.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:04:08Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:148ecce6-1db3-4762-a2c5-4509f7fa8f81
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:04:08Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:148ecce6-1db3-4762-a2c5-4509f7fa8f812022-03-26T10:20:27ZVariance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessionsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:148ecce6-1db3-4762-a2c5-4509f7fa8f81EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2016Gonzalez-Castillo, JChen, GNichols, TBandettini, PHere we report an exploratory within-subject variance decomposition analysis conducted on a task-based fMRI dataset with an unusually large number of repeated measures (i.e., 500 trials in each of three different subjects) distributed across 100 functional scans and 9 to 10 different sessions. Within-subject variance was segregated into four primary components: variance across-sessions, variance across-runs within a session, variance across-blocks within a run, and residual measurement/modeling error. Our results reveal inhomogeneous and distinct spatial distributions of these variance components across significantly active voxels in grey matter. Measurement error is dominant across the whole brain. Detailed evaluation of the remaining three components shows that across-session variance is the second largest contributor to total variance in occipital cortex, while across-runs variance is the second dominant source for the rest of the brain. Network-specific analysis revealed that across-block variance contributes more to total variance in higher-order cognitive networks than in somatosensory cortex. Moreover, in some higher-order cognitive networks across-block variance can exceed across-session variance. These results help us better understand the temporal (i.e., across blocks, runs and sessions) and spatial distributions (i.e., across different networks) of within-subject natural variability in estimates of task responses in fMRI. They also suggest that different brain regions will show different natural levels of test-retest reliability even in the absence of residual artifacts and sufficiently high contrast-to-noise measurements. Further confirmation with a larger sample of subjects and other tasks is necessary to ensure generality of these results.
spellingShingle Gonzalez-Castillo, J
Chen, G
Nichols, T
Bandettini, P
Variance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessions
title Variance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessions
title_full Variance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessions
title_fullStr Variance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessions
title_full_unstemmed Variance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessions
title_short Variance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessions
title_sort variance decomposition for single subject task based fmri activity estimates across many sessions
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezcastilloj variancedecompositionforsinglesubjecttaskbasedfmriactivityestimatesacrossmanysessions
AT cheng variancedecompositionforsinglesubjecttaskbasedfmriactivityestimatesacrossmanysessions
AT nicholst variancedecompositionforsinglesubjecttaskbasedfmriactivityestimatesacrossmanysessions
AT bandettinip variancedecompositionforsinglesubjecttaskbasedfmriactivityestimatesacrossmanysessions