Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare

<p>Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care.</p> <p><strong>Objectives</strong> To synthesise the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Webb, R, Uddin, N, Constantinou, G, Ford, E, Easter, A, Shakespeare, J, Hann, A, Roberts, N, Alderdice, F, Sinesi, A, Coates, R, Hogg, S, Ayers, S
Other Authors: MATRIx Study Team
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
_version_ 1826311081430089728
author Webb, R
Uddin, N
Constantinou, G
Ford, E
Easter, A
Shakespeare, J
Hann, A
Roberts, N
Alderdice, F
Sinesi, A
Coates, R
Hogg, S
Ayers, S
author2 MATRIx Study Team
author_facet MATRIx Study Team
Webb, R
Uddin, N
Constantinou, G
Ford, E
Easter, A
Shakespeare, J
Hann, A
Roberts, N
Alderdice, F
Sinesi, A
Coates, R
Hogg, S
Ayers, S
author_sort Webb, R
collection OXFORD
description <p>Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care.</p> <p><strong>Objectives</strong> To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators to women to seeking help, accessing help, and engaging in PMH care, and to suggest recommendations for clinical practice and policy.</p> <p><strong>Design</strong> A meta-review of systematic reviews.</p> <p><strong>Review methods</strong> Seven databases were searched and reviewed using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses search strategy. Studies that focused on the views of women seeking help and accessing PMH care were included. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used to assess review methodology. To improve validity of results, a qualitative sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether themes remained consistent across all reviews, regardless of their quality rating.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> A total of 32 reviews were included. A wide range of barriers and facilitators to women accessing PMH care were identified. These mapped across a multilevel model of influential factors (individual, healthcare professional, interpersonal, organisational, political and societal) and across the care pathway (from decision to consult to receiving care). Evidence-based recommendations to support the design and delivery of PMH care were produced based on identified barriers and facilitators.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong> The identified barriers and facilitators point to a complex interplay of many factors, highlighting the need for an international effort to increase awareness of PMH problems, reduce mental health stigma, and provide woman-centred, flexible care, delivered by well trained and culturally sensitive primary care, maternity, and psychiatric health professionals.</p> <p><strong>PROSPERO registration number</strong> CRD42019142854.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:03:06Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1493f78d-480c-42fc-8733-4669e43b30fa
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:03:06Z
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1493f78d-480c-42fc-8733-4669e43b30fa2023-10-12T17:25:29ZMeta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcareJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1493f78d-480c-42fc-8733-4669e43b30faEnglishSymplectic ElementsBMJ Publishing Group2023Webb, RUddin, NConstantinou, GFord, EEaster, AShakespeare, JHann, ARoberts, NAlderdice, FSinesi, ACoates, RHogg, SAyers, SMATRIx Study Team<p>Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care.</p> <p><strong>Objectives</strong> To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators to women to seeking help, accessing help, and engaging in PMH care, and to suggest recommendations for clinical practice and policy.</p> <p><strong>Design</strong> A meta-review of systematic reviews.</p> <p><strong>Review methods</strong> Seven databases were searched and reviewed using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses search strategy. Studies that focused on the views of women seeking help and accessing PMH care were included. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used to assess review methodology. To improve validity of results, a qualitative sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether themes remained consistent across all reviews, regardless of their quality rating.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> A total of 32 reviews were included. A wide range of barriers and facilitators to women accessing PMH care were identified. These mapped across a multilevel model of influential factors (individual, healthcare professional, interpersonal, organisational, political and societal) and across the care pathway (from decision to consult to receiving care). Evidence-based recommendations to support the design and delivery of PMH care were produced based on identified barriers and facilitators.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong> The identified barriers and facilitators point to a complex interplay of many factors, highlighting the need for an international effort to increase awareness of PMH problems, reduce mental health stigma, and provide woman-centred, flexible care, delivered by well trained and culturally sensitive primary care, maternity, and psychiatric health professionals.</p> <p><strong>PROSPERO registration number</strong> CRD42019142854.</p>
spellingShingle Webb, R
Uddin, N
Constantinou, G
Ford, E
Easter, A
Shakespeare, J
Hann, A
Roberts, N
Alderdice, F
Sinesi, A
Coates, R
Hogg, S
Ayers, S
Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_full Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_fullStr Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_short Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
title_sort meta review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare
work_keys_str_mv AT webbr metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT uddinn metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT constantinoug metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT forde metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT eastera metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT shakespearej metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT hanna metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT robertsn metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT alderdicef metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT sinesia metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT coatesr metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT hoggs metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare
AT ayerss metareviewofthebarriersandfacilitatorstowomenaccessingperinatalmentalhealthcare