Is neurolaw conceptually confused?
In <em>Minds, Brains, and Law</em>, Michael Pardo and Dennis Patterson argue that current attempts to use neuroscience to inform the theory and practice of law founder because they are built on confused conceptual foundations. Proponents of neurolaw attribute to the brain or to its parts...
Main Author: | Levy, N |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2014
|
Subjects: |
Similar Items
-
The value of consciousness
by: Levy, N
Published: (2014) -
Psychopaths and blame : the argument from content
by: Levy, N
Published: (2014) -
Searle's Wager
by: Levy, N
Published: (2011) -
The regulation of cognitive enhancement devices : extending the medical model
by: Maslen, H, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Reward prediction error signals are meta-representational
by: Shea, N
Published: (2012)