Zaccaria Lilio and the shape of the earth: A brief response to Allegro’s “Flat earth science”

This is a response to James J. Allegro’s article “The bottom of the universe: Flat earth science in the Age of Encounter,” published in Volume 55, Number 1, of this journal. Against the solid consensus of modern scholars, Allegro contends that the decades around 1500 saw a resurgence of popular and...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Chi tiết về thư mục
Tác giả chính: Nothaft, C
Định dạng: Journal article
Được phát hành: SAGE Publications 2017
_version_ 1826260634880180224
author Nothaft, C
author_facet Nothaft, C
author_sort Nothaft, C
collection OXFORD
description This is a response to James J. Allegro’s article “The bottom of the universe: Flat earth science in the Age of Encounter,” published in Volume 55, Number 1, of this journal. Against the solid consensus of modern scholars, Allegro contends that the decades around 1500 saw a resurgence of popular and learned doubts about the existence of a southern hemisphere and the concept of a spherical earth more generally. It can be shown that a substantial part of Allegro’s argument rests on an erroneous reading of his main textual witness, Zaccaria Lilio’s <i>Contra Antipodes</i> (1496), and on a failure adequately to place this source in the context of the cosmographical debate of the late-fifteenth and early-sixteenth centuries. Once this context is taken into account, the notion that Lilio was a flat-earther falls flat.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:08:47Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:16124e4c-f194-4c36-809f-d13a7939308a
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:08:47Z
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:16124e4c-f194-4c36-809f-d13a7939308a2022-03-26T10:29:05ZZaccaria Lilio and the shape of the earth: A brief response to Allegro’s “Flat earth science”Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:16124e4c-f194-4c36-809f-d13a7939308aSymplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2017Nothaft, CThis is a response to James J. Allegro’s article “The bottom of the universe: Flat earth science in the Age of Encounter,” published in Volume 55, Number 1, of this journal. Against the solid consensus of modern scholars, Allegro contends that the decades around 1500 saw a resurgence of popular and learned doubts about the existence of a southern hemisphere and the concept of a spherical earth more generally. It can be shown that a substantial part of Allegro’s argument rests on an erroneous reading of his main textual witness, Zaccaria Lilio’s <i>Contra Antipodes</i> (1496), and on a failure adequately to place this source in the context of the cosmographical debate of the late-fifteenth and early-sixteenth centuries. Once this context is taken into account, the notion that Lilio was a flat-earther falls flat.
spellingShingle Nothaft, C
Zaccaria Lilio and the shape of the earth: A brief response to Allegro’s “Flat earth science”
title Zaccaria Lilio and the shape of the earth: A brief response to Allegro’s “Flat earth science”
title_full Zaccaria Lilio and the shape of the earth: A brief response to Allegro’s “Flat earth science”
title_fullStr Zaccaria Lilio and the shape of the earth: A brief response to Allegro’s “Flat earth science”
title_full_unstemmed Zaccaria Lilio and the shape of the earth: A brief response to Allegro’s “Flat earth science”
title_short Zaccaria Lilio and the shape of the earth: A brief response to Allegro’s “Flat earth science”
title_sort zaccaria lilio and the shape of the earth a brief response to allegro s flat earth science
work_keys_str_mv AT nothaftc zaccarialilioandtheshapeoftheearthabriefresponsetoallegrosflatearthscience