Could global democracy satisfy diverse policy values? An empirical analysis

<p style="text-align:justify;"> An important strand in contemporary political theory argues that democratic methods of political decision making should be extended to the global level. But are people’s fundamental views on public policy issues too diverse across the world for democr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hale, T, Koenig-Archibugi, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: University of Chicago Press 2018
_version_ 1797055395280191488
author Hale, T
Koenig-Archibugi, M
author_facet Hale, T
Koenig-Archibugi, M
author_sort Hale, T
collection OXFORD
description <p style="text-align:justify;"> An important strand in contemporary political theory argues that democratic methods of political decision making should be extended to the global level. But are people’s fundamental views on public policy issues too diverse across the world for democracy? We examine systematically the empirical basis of two related concerns: that global democratic decision making would leave more people dissatisfied with the outcome of decisions than keeping democratic decision making within national settings and that it would increase the risk of persistent minorities, that is, groups who are systematically outvoted on most policy issues they care about. Using opinion polls covering 86% of the world population, we compare the distribution of policy values within countries to the distribution of policy values in the world as a whole. We find that the amount of dissatisfaction with policy and the risk of persistent minorities would not increase in a global democratic polity compared to individual states. </p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:10:06Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:16776aec-cb78-410b-ac1f-0649d032095b
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:10:06Z
publishDate 2018
publisher University of Chicago Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:16776aec-cb78-410b-ac1f-0649d032095b2022-03-26T10:31:33ZCould global democracy satisfy diverse policy values? An empirical analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:16776aec-cb78-410b-ac1f-0649d032095bEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordUniversity of Chicago Press2018Hale, TKoenig-Archibugi, M <p style="text-align:justify;"> An important strand in contemporary political theory argues that democratic methods of political decision making should be extended to the global level. But are people’s fundamental views on public policy issues too diverse across the world for democracy? We examine systematically the empirical basis of two related concerns: that global democratic decision making would leave more people dissatisfied with the outcome of decisions than keeping democratic decision making within national settings and that it would increase the risk of persistent minorities, that is, groups who are systematically outvoted on most policy issues they care about. Using opinion polls covering 86% of the world population, we compare the distribution of policy values within countries to the distribution of policy values in the world as a whole. We find that the amount of dissatisfaction with policy and the risk of persistent minorities would not increase in a global democratic polity compared to individual states. </p>
spellingShingle Hale, T
Koenig-Archibugi, M
Could global democracy satisfy diverse policy values? An empirical analysis
title Could global democracy satisfy diverse policy values? An empirical analysis
title_full Could global democracy satisfy diverse policy values? An empirical analysis
title_fullStr Could global democracy satisfy diverse policy values? An empirical analysis
title_full_unstemmed Could global democracy satisfy diverse policy values? An empirical analysis
title_short Could global democracy satisfy diverse policy values? An empirical analysis
title_sort could global democracy satisfy diverse policy values an empirical analysis
work_keys_str_mv AT halet couldglobaldemocracysatisfydiversepolicyvaluesanempiricalanalysis
AT koenigarchibugim couldglobaldemocracysatisfydiversepolicyvaluesanempiricalanalysis