The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial

<p><b>Background </b></p> Childhood bullying is a public health priority. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of KiVa, a whole-school anti-bullying program that targets the peer context. <p><b>Methods </b></p> A two-arm pragmatic multicenter clus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Badger, JR, Bowes, L, Babu, M, Broome, M, Cannings-John, R, Clarkson, S, Coulman, E, Tudor Edwards, R, Ford, T, Hastings, RP, Hayes, R, Lugg-Widger, F, Owen-Jones, E, Patterson, P, Segrott, J, Sydenham, M, Townson, J, Watkins, RC, Whiteley, H, Williams, ME, Stand Together Team, Hutchings, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024
_version_ 1824458559606226944
author Badger, JR
Bowes, L
Babu, M
Broome, M
Cannings-John, R
Clarkson, S
Coulman, E
Tudor Edwards, R
Ford, T
Hastings, RP
Hayes, R
Lugg-Widger, F
Owen-Jones, E
Patterson, P
Segrott, J
Sydenham, M
Townson, J
Watkins, RC
Whiteley, H
Williams, ME
Stand Together Team
Hutchings, J
author_facet Badger, JR
Bowes, L
Babu, M
Broome, M
Cannings-John, R
Clarkson, S
Coulman, E
Tudor Edwards, R
Ford, T
Hastings, RP
Hayes, R
Lugg-Widger, F
Owen-Jones, E
Patterson, P
Segrott, J
Sydenham, M
Townson, J
Watkins, RC
Whiteley, H
Williams, ME
Stand Together Team
Hutchings, J
author_sort Badger, JR
collection OXFORD
description <p><b>Background </b></p> Childhood bullying is a public health priority. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of KiVa, a whole-school anti-bullying program that targets the peer context. <p><b>Methods </b></p> A two-arm pragmatic multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded economic evaluation. Schools were randomized to KiVa-intervention or usual practice (UP), stratified on school size and Free School Meals eligibility. KiVa was delivered by trained teachers across one school year. Follow-up was at 12 months post randomization. Primary outcome: student-reported bullying-victimization; secondary outcomes: self-reported bullying-perpetration, participant roles in bullying, empathy and teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Outcomes were analyzed using multilevel linear and logistic regression models. <p><b>Findings </b></p> Between 8/11/2019–12/02/2021, 118 primary schools were recruited in four trial sites, 11 111 students in primary analysis (KiVa-intervention: n = 5944; 49.6% female; UP: n = 5167, 49.0% female). At baseline, 21.6% of students reported being bullied in the UP group and 20.3% in the KiVa-intervention group, reducing to 20.7% in the UP group and 17.7% in the KiVa-intervention group at follow-up (odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.97, p value = 0.009). Students in the KiVa group had significantly higher empathy and reduced peer problems. We found no differences in bullying perpetration, school wellbeing, emotional or behavioral problems. A priori subgroup analyses revealed no differences in effectiveness by socioeconomic gradient, or by gender. KiVa costs £20.78 more per pupil than usual practice in the first year, and £1.65 more per pupil in subsequent years. <p><b>Interpretation </b></p> The KiVa anti-bullying program is effective at reducing bullying victimization with small-moderate effects of public health importance. <p><b>Funding </b></p> The study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research program (17-92-11). Intervention costs were funded by the Rayne Foundation, GwE North Wales Regional School Improvement Service, Children's Services, Devon County Council and HSBC Global Services (UK) Ltd.
first_indexed 2024-12-09T03:17:58Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:173c7bac-b44b-423b-b03f-2794ba4c1691
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-19T04:27:49Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:173c7bac-b44b-423b-b03f-2794ba4c16912024-12-13T10:20:03ZThe effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trialJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:173c7bac-b44b-423b-b03f-2794ba4c1691EnglishSymplectic ElementsCambridge University Press2024Badger, JRBowes, LBabu, MBroome, MCannings-John, RClarkson, SCoulman, ETudor Edwards, RFord, THastings, RPHayes, RLugg-Widger, FOwen-Jones, EPatterson, PSegrott, JSydenham, MTownson, JWatkins, RCWhiteley, HWilliams, ME Stand Together TeamHutchings, J<p><b>Background </b></p> Childhood bullying is a public health priority. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of KiVa, a whole-school anti-bullying program that targets the peer context. <p><b>Methods </b></p> A two-arm pragmatic multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded economic evaluation. Schools were randomized to KiVa-intervention or usual practice (UP), stratified on school size and Free School Meals eligibility. KiVa was delivered by trained teachers across one school year. Follow-up was at 12 months post randomization. Primary outcome: student-reported bullying-victimization; secondary outcomes: self-reported bullying-perpetration, participant roles in bullying, empathy and teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Outcomes were analyzed using multilevel linear and logistic regression models. <p><b>Findings </b></p> Between 8/11/2019–12/02/2021, 118 primary schools were recruited in four trial sites, 11 111 students in primary analysis (KiVa-intervention: n = 5944; 49.6% female; UP: n = 5167, 49.0% female). At baseline, 21.6% of students reported being bullied in the UP group and 20.3% in the KiVa-intervention group, reducing to 20.7% in the UP group and 17.7% in the KiVa-intervention group at follow-up (odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.97, p value = 0.009). Students in the KiVa group had significantly higher empathy and reduced peer problems. We found no differences in bullying perpetration, school wellbeing, emotional or behavioral problems. A priori subgroup analyses revealed no differences in effectiveness by socioeconomic gradient, or by gender. KiVa costs £20.78 more per pupil than usual practice in the first year, and £1.65 more per pupil in subsequent years. <p><b>Interpretation </b></p> The KiVa anti-bullying program is effective at reducing bullying victimization with small-moderate effects of public health importance. <p><b>Funding </b></p> The study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research program (17-92-11). Intervention costs were funded by the Rayne Foundation, GwE North Wales Regional School Improvement Service, Children's Services, Devon County Council and HSBC Global Services (UK) Ltd.
spellingShingle Badger, JR
Bowes, L
Babu, M
Broome, M
Cannings-John, R
Clarkson, S
Coulman, E
Tudor Edwards, R
Ford, T
Hastings, RP
Hayes, R
Lugg-Widger, F
Owen-Jones, E
Patterson, P
Segrott, J
Sydenham, M
Townson, J
Watkins, RC
Whiteley, H
Williams, ME
Stand Together Team
Hutchings, J
The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial
title The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort effects and costs of an anti bullying program kiva in uk primary schools a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial
work_keys_str_mv AT badgerjr theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bowesl theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT babum theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT broomem theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT canningsjohnr theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT clarksons theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coulmane theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tudoredwardsr theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fordt theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hastingsrp theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hayesr theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luggwidgerf theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT owenjonese theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pattersonp theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT segrottj theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sydenhamm theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT townsonj theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT watkinsrc theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT whiteleyh theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT williamsme theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT standtogetherteam theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hutchingsj theeffectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT badgerjr effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bowesl effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT babum effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT broomem effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT canningsjohnr effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT clarksons effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coulmane effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tudoredwardsr effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fordt effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hastingsrp effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hayesr effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luggwidgerf effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT owenjonese effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pattersonp effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT segrottj effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sydenhamm effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT townsonj effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT watkinsrc effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT whiteleyh effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT williamsme effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT standtogetherteam effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hutchingsj effectsandcostsofanantibullyingprogramkivainukprimaryschoolsamulticenterclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial