Effects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random-dot kinematograms

Two-frame random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) of different dot density, area and contrast were used to study the spatial properties of the human visual motion system. It was found that the maximum spatial displacement at which observers could reliably discriminate the direction of motion (<i>d<...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eagle, R, Rogers, B
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 1997
Subjects:
_version_ 1826260928398622720
author Eagle, R
Rogers, B
author_facet Eagle, R
Rogers, B
author_sort Eagle, R
collection OXFORD
description Two-frame random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) of different dot density, area and contrast were used to study the spatial properties of the human visual motion system. It was found that the maximum spatial displacement at which observers could reliably discriminate the direction of motion (<i>d</i><sub>max</sub>) increased gradually by a factor of up to 6.4 as dot density was decreased from 50 to 0.025% for high Michelson contrast (0.997) stimuli. As stimulus area was reduced from 645 deg<sup>2</sup>, this trend gradually disappeared so that by a stimulus area of 2.56 deg<sup>2</sup>, there was no effect of density upon <i>d</i><sub>max</sub>. A further experiment investigated the effects of reducing Michelson contrast from 0.77 to 0.2 on <i>d</i><sub>max</sub> over this same range of dot densities. It was found that at the highest densities, <i>d</i><sub>max</sub> declined as contrast was reduced. Furthermore, for contrasts at and below 0.4, <i>d</i><sub>max</sub> was invariant of density over the range 50-5%. These results can be accounted for by the fact that both reducing contrast, while keeping density fixed, and reducing density, while maintaining a fixed high contrast, reduce the stimulus mean luminance. For all contrasts, decreasing density below 5% led to an increase in <i>d</i><sub>max</sub>. However, the rate of this increase was slower for the lower contrast stimuli. A two-stage model based on bandpass filtering followed by an informationally limited motion detection stage is proposed and shown to provide a good account of these data.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:13:30Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:17905e56-4da7-42b4-a4d1-904ab0ae0816
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:13:30Z
publishDate 1997
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:17905e56-4da7-42b4-a4d1-904ab0ae08162022-03-26T10:38:04ZEffects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random-dot kinematogramsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:17905e56-4da7-42b4-a4d1-904ab0ae0816PerceptionEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetElsevier1997Eagle, RRogers, BTwo-frame random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) of different dot density, area and contrast were used to study the spatial properties of the human visual motion system. It was found that the maximum spatial displacement at which observers could reliably discriminate the direction of motion (<i>d</i><sub>max</sub>) increased gradually by a factor of up to 6.4 as dot density was decreased from 50 to 0.025% for high Michelson contrast (0.997) stimuli. As stimulus area was reduced from 645 deg<sup>2</sup>, this trend gradually disappeared so that by a stimulus area of 2.56 deg<sup>2</sup>, there was no effect of density upon <i>d</i><sub>max</sub>. A further experiment investigated the effects of reducing Michelson contrast from 0.77 to 0.2 on <i>d</i><sub>max</sub> over this same range of dot densities. It was found that at the highest densities, <i>d</i><sub>max</sub> declined as contrast was reduced. Furthermore, for contrasts at and below 0.4, <i>d</i><sub>max</sub> was invariant of density over the range 50-5%. These results can be accounted for by the fact that both reducing contrast, while keeping density fixed, and reducing density, while maintaining a fixed high contrast, reduce the stimulus mean luminance. For all contrasts, decreasing density below 5% led to an increase in <i>d</i><sub>max</sub>. However, the rate of this increase was slower for the lower contrast stimuli. A two-stage model based on bandpass filtering followed by an informationally limited motion detection stage is proposed and shown to provide a good account of these data.
spellingShingle Perception
Eagle, R
Rogers, B
Effects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random-dot kinematograms
title Effects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random-dot kinematograms
title_full Effects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random-dot kinematograms
title_fullStr Effects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random-dot kinematograms
title_full_unstemmed Effects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random-dot kinematograms
title_short Effects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random-dot kinematograms
title_sort effects of dot density patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random dot kinematograms
topic Perception
work_keys_str_mv AT eagler effectsofdotdensitypatchsizeandcontrastontheupperspatiallimitfordirectiondiscriminationinrandomdotkinematograms
AT rogersb effectsofdotdensitypatchsizeandcontrastontheupperspatiallimitfordirectiondiscriminationinrandomdotkinematograms