Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study.
<h4>Objectives</h4> <p>To examine whether the continuous updating of networks of prospectively planned randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (‘living’ network meta-analysis) provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis in comparative effectiveness of medical interventions e...
Main Authors: | Nikolakopoulou, A, Mavridis, D, Furukawa, TA, Cipriani, A, Tricco, AC, Straus, SE, Siontis, GCM, Egger, M, Salanti, G |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Similar Items
-
Living network meta-analysis of prospectively planned trials for timely recommendations: An empirical study
by: Nikolakopoulou, A, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Combining endpoint and change data did not affect the summary standardised mean difference in pairwise and network meta‐analyses: An empirical study in depression
by: Ostinelli, EG, et al.
Published: (2024) -
ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis
by: Virginia Chiocchia, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
A Bayesian dose-response meta-analysis model: a simulations study and application
by: Hamza, T, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Allowing for uncertainty due to missing and LOCF imputed outcomes in meta‐analysis
by: Mavridis, D, et al.
Published: (2018)