Comparative carcinogenicity for mouse-skin of smoke condensates prepared from cigarettes made from the same tobacco cured by two processes.

Bright tobacco grown in Mexico was either flue-cured and redried (FC) or air-cured and bulk-fermented (AC). Both FC and AC were made into cigarettes standardized for draw resistance. FC and AC cigarettes were smoked under similar conditions in a smoking machine (one 2-second 25 ml. puff per minute d...

Celý popis

Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autoři: Roe, F, Clack, J, Bishop, D, Peto, R
Médium: Journal article
Jazyk:English
Vydáno: 1970
_version_ 1826261189067276288
author Roe, F
Clack, J
Bishop, D
Peto, R
author_facet Roe, F
Clack, J
Bishop, D
Peto, R
author_sort Roe, F
collection OXFORD
description Bright tobacco grown in Mexico was either flue-cured and redried (FC) or air-cured and bulk-fermented (AC). Both FC and AC were made into cigarettes standardized for draw resistance. FC and AC cigarettes were smoked under similar conditions in a smoking machine (one 2-second 25 ml. puff per minute down to a 20 mm. butt length). Condensates were kept at 0-4° C. until applied to the skin of mice.Three groups of 400 female Swiss mice were treated as follows: Group 1- thrice weekly application of 60 mg. FC in 0.25 ml. acetone to the clipped dorsal skin: Group 2- similar treatment with AC; Group 3-thrice weekly application of 0.25 ml. acetone only.Chemical analysis of the 2 tobaccos and 2 condensates revealed only small differences in composition and it is noteworthy that the concentration of reducing sugars was almost as high as in the AC tobacco as in the FC tobacco.The risk of development of skin tumours, particularly malignant skin tumours, was higher in FC-treated mice than in AC-treated mice (p < 0.01), but the difference may have been due to the use of equal weights of condensates rather than the use of extracts from equal numbers of cigarettes, since the AC cigarettes produced more condensate. The rates of detection of pulmonary tumours also varied between groups (p < 0.01) but this does not necessarily imply that the incidence rates of pulmonary tumours varied. There was no evidence that the detection or incidence rates of any other neoplasms, including malignant lymphoma, were affected by treatment with either of the condensates.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:17:36Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:18f128d9-ad67-40fb-a59b-ee27b8be9251
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:17:36Z
publishDate 1970
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:18f128d9-ad67-40fb-a59b-ee27b8be92512022-03-26T10:46:10ZComparative carcinogenicity for mouse-skin of smoke condensates prepared from cigarettes made from the same tobacco cured by two processes.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:18f128d9-ad67-40fb-a59b-ee27b8be9251EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1970Roe, FClack, JBishop, DPeto, RBright tobacco grown in Mexico was either flue-cured and redried (FC) or air-cured and bulk-fermented (AC). Both FC and AC were made into cigarettes standardized for draw resistance. FC and AC cigarettes were smoked under similar conditions in a smoking machine (one 2-second 25 ml. puff per minute down to a 20 mm. butt length). Condensates were kept at 0-4° C. until applied to the skin of mice.Three groups of 400 female Swiss mice were treated as follows: Group 1- thrice weekly application of 60 mg. FC in 0.25 ml. acetone to the clipped dorsal skin: Group 2- similar treatment with AC; Group 3-thrice weekly application of 0.25 ml. acetone only.Chemical analysis of the 2 tobaccos and 2 condensates revealed only small differences in composition and it is noteworthy that the concentration of reducing sugars was almost as high as in the AC tobacco as in the FC tobacco.The risk of development of skin tumours, particularly malignant skin tumours, was higher in FC-treated mice than in AC-treated mice (p < 0.01), but the difference may have been due to the use of equal weights of condensates rather than the use of extracts from equal numbers of cigarettes, since the AC cigarettes produced more condensate. The rates of detection of pulmonary tumours also varied between groups (p < 0.01) but this does not necessarily imply that the incidence rates of pulmonary tumours varied. There was no evidence that the detection or incidence rates of any other neoplasms, including malignant lymphoma, were affected by treatment with either of the condensates.
spellingShingle Roe, F
Clack, J
Bishop, D
Peto, R
Comparative carcinogenicity for mouse-skin of smoke condensates prepared from cigarettes made from the same tobacco cured by two processes.
title Comparative carcinogenicity for mouse-skin of smoke condensates prepared from cigarettes made from the same tobacco cured by two processes.
title_full Comparative carcinogenicity for mouse-skin of smoke condensates prepared from cigarettes made from the same tobacco cured by two processes.
title_fullStr Comparative carcinogenicity for mouse-skin of smoke condensates prepared from cigarettes made from the same tobacco cured by two processes.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative carcinogenicity for mouse-skin of smoke condensates prepared from cigarettes made from the same tobacco cured by two processes.
title_short Comparative carcinogenicity for mouse-skin of smoke condensates prepared from cigarettes made from the same tobacco cured by two processes.
title_sort comparative carcinogenicity for mouse skin of smoke condensates prepared from cigarettes made from the same tobacco cured by two processes
work_keys_str_mv AT roef comparativecarcinogenicityformouseskinofsmokecondensatespreparedfromcigarettesmadefromthesametobaccocuredbytwoprocesses
AT clackj comparativecarcinogenicityformouseskinofsmokecondensatespreparedfromcigarettesmadefromthesametobaccocuredbytwoprocesses
AT bishopd comparativecarcinogenicityformouseskinofsmokecondensatespreparedfromcigarettesmadefromthesametobaccocuredbytwoprocesses
AT petor comparativecarcinogenicityformouseskinofsmokecondensatespreparedfromcigarettesmadefromthesametobaccocuredbytwoprocesses