Test-retest reliability of EQ-5D-Y best-worst scaling choices of adolescents and adults

<p><strong>Background:</strong> There is an increasing interest to obtain adolescents’ own health state valuation preferences and to understand how these differ from adult preferences for the same health state. An important question in health state valuation is whether adolescents...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Xiong, X, Dalziel, K, Huang, L, Rivero Arias, O
Formato: Journal article
Idioma:English
Publicado em: Elsevier 2022
_version_ 1826309151290032128
author Xiong, X
Dalziel, K
Huang, L
Rivero Arias, O
author_facet Xiong, X
Dalziel, K
Huang, L
Rivero Arias, O
author_sort Xiong, X
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Background:</strong> There is an increasing interest to obtain adolescents’ own health state valuation preferences and to understand how these differ from adult preferences for the same health state. An important question in health state valuation is whether adolescents can report preferences reliably, yet research remains limited.</p> <p><strong>Objective:</strong> This study aims to investigate the test-retest reliability of best-worst scaling (BWS) to elicit adolescent preferences compared with adults.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> Identical BWS tasks designed to value EQ-5D-Y-3L health states were administered online in samples of 1000 adolescents (aged 11-17 years) and 1006 adults in Spain. The valuation survey was repeated approximately three days later. We calculated (1) simple percentage agreement, (2) kappa statistic as measures of test-retest reliability. We also compared BWS marginal frequencies, and relative attribute importance (RAI) between baseline and followup to explore similarities in the obtained preferences.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> We found that both adolescents and adults were able to report their preferences with moderate reliability (kappa: 0.46 for adolescents, 0.46 for adults) for best choices and fair to moderate reliability (kappa: 0.39 for adolescents, 0.41 for adults) for worst choices. No notable difference was observed across years of child age. Higher consistency was observed for best choices compared to worst in some dimensions for both populations. No significant differences were found in the RAI between baseline and follow-up in both populations.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Our results suggest that BWS is a reliable elicitation technique to value EQ-5D-Y-3L health states in both adolescents and adults.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:29:53Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1919030c-d8e2-42a1-9e7d-d03c801bebe0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:29:53Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1919030c-d8e2-42a1-9e7d-d03c801bebe02023-01-13T10:10:08ZTest-retest reliability of EQ-5D-Y best-worst scaling choices of adolescents and adultsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1919030c-d8e2-42a1-9e7d-d03c801bebe0EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2022Xiong, XDalziel, KHuang, LRivero Arias, O<p><strong>Background:</strong> There is an increasing interest to obtain adolescents’ own health state valuation preferences and to understand how these differ from adult preferences for the same health state. An important question in health state valuation is whether adolescents can report preferences reliably, yet research remains limited.</p> <p><strong>Objective:</strong> This study aims to investigate the test-retest reliability of best-worst scaling (BWS) to elicit adolescent preferences compared with adults.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> Identical BWS tasks designed to value EQ-5D-Y-3L health states were administered online in samples of 1000 adolescents (aged 11-17 years) and 1006 adults in Spain. The valuation survey was repeated approximately three days later. We calculated (1) simple percentage agreement, (2) kappa statistic as measures of test-retest reliability. We also compared BWS marginal frequencies, and relative attribute importance (RAI) between baseline and followup to explore similarities in the obtained preferences.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> We found that both adolescents and adults were able to report their preferences with moderate reliability (kappa: 0.46 for adolescents, 0.46 for adults) for best choices and fair to moderate reliability (kappa: 0.39 for adolescents, 0.41 for adults) for worst choices. No notable difference was observed across years of child age. Higher consistency was observed for best choices compared to worst in some dimensions for both populations. No significant differences were found in the RAI between baseline and follow-up in both populations.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Our results suggest that BWS is a reliable elicitation technique to value EQ-5D-Y-3L health states in both adolescents and adults.</p>
spellingShingle Xiong, X
Dalziel, K
Huang, L
Rivero Arias, O
Test-retest reliability of EQ-5D-Y best-worst scaling choices of adolescents and adults
title Test-retest reliability of EQ-5D-Y best-worst scaling choices of adolescents and adults
title_full Test-retest reliability of EQ-5D-Y best-worst scaling choices of adolescents and adults
title_fullStr Test-retest reliability of EQ-5D-Y best-worst scaling choices of adolescents and adults
title_full_unstemmed Test-retest reliability of EQ-5D-Y best-worst scaling choices of adolescents and adults
title_short Test-retest reliability of EQ-5D-Y best-worst scaling choices of adolescents and adults
title_sort test retest reliability of eq 5d y best worst scaling choices of adolescents and adults
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongx testretestreliabilityofeq5dybestworstscalingchoicesofadolescentsandadults
AT dalzielk testretestreliabilityofeq5dybestworstscalingchoicesofadolescentsandadults
AT huangl testretestreliabilityofeq5dybestworstscalingchoicesofadolescentsandadults
AT riveroariaso testretestreliabilityofeq5dybestworstscalingchoicesofadolescentsandadults