Economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: Challenges, methods and recommendations
Increasing numbers of economic evaluations are conducted alongside randomised controlled trials. Such studies include factorial trials, which randomise patients to different levels of two or more factors and can therefore evaluate the effect of multiple treatments alone and in combination. Factorial...
| Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | , |
|---|---|
| Μορφή: | Journal article |
| Γλώσσα: | English |
| Έκδοση: |
Wiley
2017
|
| _version_ | 1826261358964899840 |
|---|---|
| author | Dakin, H Gray, A |
| author_facet | Dakin, H Gray, A |
| author_sort | Dakin, H |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Increasing numbers of economic evaluations are conducted alongside randomised controlled trials. Such studies include factorial trials, which randomise patients to different levels of two or more factors and can therefore evaluate the effect of multiple treatments alone and in combination. Factorial trials can provide increased statistical power or assess interactions between treatments, but raise additional challenges for trial-based economic evaluations: interactions may occur more commonly for costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than for clinical endpoints; economic endpoints raise challenges for transformation and regression analysis; and both factors must be considered simultaneously to assess which treatment combination represents best value for money. This article aims to examine issues associated with factorial trials that include assessment of costs and/or cost-effectiveness, describe the methods that can be used to analyse such studies; and make recommendations for health economists, statisticians and trialists. A hypothetical worked example is used to illustrate the challenges and demonstrate ways in which economic evaluations of factorial trials may be conducted, and how these methods affect the results and conclusions. Ignoring interactions introduces bias that could result in adopting a treatment that does not make best use of healthcare resources, while considering all interactions avoids bias but reduces statistical power. We also introduce the concept of the opportunity cost of ignoring interactions as a measure of the bias introduced by not taking account of all interactions. We conclude by offering recommendations for planning, analysing and reporting economic evaluations based on factorial trials, taking increased analysis costs into account. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:20:09Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:19cd8e91-22b8-4310-b78e-00605ef83f3a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:20:09Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:19cd8e91-22b8-4310-b78e-00605ef83f3a2022-03-26T10:51:02ZEconomic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: Challenges, methods and recommendationsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:19cd8e91-22b8-4310-b78e-00605ef83f3aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2017Dakin, HGray, AIncreasing numbers of economic evaluations are conducted alongside randomised controlled trials. Such studies include factorial trials, which randomise patients to different levels of two or more factors and can therefore evaluate the effect of multiple treatments alone and in combination. Factorial trials can provide increased statistical power or assess interactions between treatments, but raise additional challenges for trial-based economic evaluations: interactions may occur more commonly for costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than for clinical endpoints; economic endpoints raise challenges for transformation and regression analysis; and both factors must be considered simultaneously to assess which treatment combination represents best value for money. This article aims to examine issues associated with factorial trials that include assessment of costs and/or cost-effectiveness, describe the methods that can be used to analyse such studies; and make recommendations for health economists, statisticians and trialists. A hypothetical worked example is used to illustrate the challenges and demonstrate ways in which economic evaluations of factorial trials may be conducted, and how these methods affect the results and conclusions. Ignoring interactions introduces bias that could result in adopting a treatment that does not make best use of healthcare resources, while considering all interactions avoids bias but reduces statistical power. We also introduce the concept of the opportunity cost of ignoring interactions as a measure of the bias introduced by not taking account of all interactions. We conclude by offering recommendations for planning, analysing and reporting economic evaluations based on factorial trials, taking increased analysis costs into account. |
| spellingShingle | Dakin, H Gray, A Economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: Challenges, methods and recommendations |
| title | Economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: Challenges, methods and recommendations |
| title_full | Economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: Challenges, methods and recommendations |
| title_fullStr | Economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: Challenges, methods and recommendations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: Challenges, methods and recommendations |
| title_short | Economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials: Challenges, methods and recommendations |
| title_sort | economic evaluation of factorial randomised controlled trials challenges methods and recommendations |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dakinh economicevaluationoffactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrialschallengesmethodsandrecommendations AT graya economicevaluationoffactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrialschallengesmethodsandrecommendations |