The case for foreign electoral subversion

It is widely alleged that President Putin's regime attempted to exercise influence on the 2016 U.S. presidential election. It is known that its Soviet predecessors funded Western communist parties for decades as a means to undermine noncommunist regimes. Similarly, the United States has a long...

Volledige beschrijving

Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteur: Fabre, C
Formaat: Journal article
Gepubliceerd in: Cambridge University Press 2018
_version_ 1826261384224047104
author Fabre, C
author_facet Fabre, C
author_sort Fabre, C
collection OXFORD
description It is widely alleged that President Putin's regime attempted to exercise influence on the 2016 U.S. presidential election. It is known that its Soviet predecessors funded Western communist parties for decades as a means to undermine noncommunist regimes. Similarly, the United States has a long history of interfering in the institutions and elections of its Latin American neighbors, as well as (at the height of the Cold War) its European allies. More recently, many believe that, absent U.S.-driven assistance, the Democratic Opposition of Serbia would have lost the 2000 Yugoslavian presidential election to Slobodan Milošević. As those examples suggest, attempting to subvert the democratic elections of a putatively sovereign country is a time-honored way of bending the latter's domestic and foreign policy to one's will. In this paper, I focus on the state-sponsored, nonviolent, nonkinetic subversion of nationwide elections (for short, subversion) through campaign and party financing, tampering with electoral registers, and conducting disinformation campaigns about candidates. I argue that, under certain conditions and subject to certain constraints, subversion is pro tanto justified as a means to prevent or end large-scale human rights violations.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:20:34Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:19f1815a-01ea-4d99-9cbe-c5181f5f2e97
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:20:34Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:19f1815a-01ea-4d99-9cbe-c5181f5f2e972022-03-26T10:51:53ZThe case for foreign electoral subversionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:19f1815a-01ea-4d99-9cbe-c5181f5f2e97Symplectic Elements at OxfordCambridge University Press2018Fabre, CIt is widely alleged that President Putin's regime attempted to exercise influence on the 2016 U.S. presidential election. It is known that its Soviet predecessors funded Western communist parties for decades as a means to undermine noncommunist regimes. Similarly, the United States has a long history of interfering in the institutions and elections of its Latin American neighbors, as well as (at the height of the Cold War) its European allies. More recently, many believe that, absent U.S.-driven assistance, the Democratic Opposition of Serbia would have lost the 2000 Yugoslavian presidential election to Slobodan Milošević. As those examples suggest, attempting to subvert the democratic elections of a putatively sovereign country is a time-honored way of bending the latter's domestic and foreign policy to one's will. In this paper, I focus on the state-sponsored, nonviolent, nonkinetic subversion of nationwide elections (for short, subversion) through campaign and party financing, tampering with electoral registers, and conducting disinformation campaigns about candidates. I argue that, under certain conditions and subject to certain constraints, subversion is pro tanto justified as a means to prevent or end large-scale human rights violations.
spellingShingle Fabre, C
The case for foreign electoral subversion
title The case for foreign electoral subversion
title_full The case for foreign electoral subversion
title_fullStr The case for foreign electoral subversion
title_full_unstemmed The case for foreign electoral subversion
title_short The case for foreign electoral subversion
title_sort case for foreign electoral subversion
work_keys_str_mv AT fabrec thecaseforforeignelectoralsubversion
AT fabrec caseforforeignelectoralsubversion