Complexity analysis of generalized and fractional hypertree decompositions
<p>Hypertree decompositions (HDs), as well as the more powerful generalized hypertree decompositions (GHDs), and the yet more general fractional hypertree decompositions (FHDs) are hypergraph decomposition methods successfully used for answering conjunctive queries and for solving constraint s...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Association for Computing Machinery
2021
|
| _version_ | 1797056581007835136 |
|---|---|
| author | Gottlob, G Lanzinger, M Pichler, R Razgon, I |
| author_facet | Gottlob, G Lanzinger, M Pichler, R Razgon, I |
| author_sort | Gottlob, G |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p>Hypertree decompositions (HDs), as well as the more powerful generalized hypertree decompositions (GHDs), and the yet more general fractional hypertree decompositions (FHDs) are hypergraph decomposition methods successfully used for answering conjunctive queries and for solving constraint satisfaction problems. Every hypergraph H has a width relative to each of these methods: its hypertree width hw(H), its generalized hypertree width ghw(H), and its fractional hypertree width fhw(H), respectively. It is known that hw(H)≤ k can be checked in polynomial time for fixed k, while checking ghw(H)≤ k is NP-complete for k ≥ 3. The complexity of checking fhw(H)≤ k for a fixed k has been open for over a decade.</p>
<p>We settle this open problem by showing that checking fhw(H)≤ k is NP-complete, even for k=2. The same construction allows us to prove also the NP-completeness of checking ghw(H)≤ k for k=2. After that, we identify meaningful restrictions that make checking for bounded ghw or fhw tractable or allow for an efficient approximation of the fhw.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:24:33Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:1b42a85b-9353-480d-9b4e-f0f6b00eefe8 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:24:33Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:1b42a85b-9353-480d-9b4e-f0f6b00eefe82022-03-26T10:59:27ZComplexity analysis of generalized and fractional hypertree decompositionsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1b42a85b-9353-480d-9b4e-f0f6b00eefe8EnglishSymplectic ElementsAssociation for Computing Machinery2021Gottlob, GLanzinger, MPichler, RRazgon, I<p>Hypertree decompositions (HDs), as well as the more powerful generalized hypertree decompositions (GHDs), and the yet more general fractional hypertree decompositions (FHDs) are hypergraph decomposition methods successfully used for answering conjunctive queries and for solving constraint satisfaction problems. Every hypergraph H has a width relative to each of these methods: its hypertree width hw(H), its generalized hypertree width ghw(H), and its fractional hypertree width fhw(H), respectively. It is known that hw(H)≤ k can be checked in polynomial time for fixed k, while checking ghw(H)≤ k is NP-complete for k ≥ 3. The complexity of checking fhw(H)≤ k for a fixed k has been open for over a decade.</p> <p>We settle this open problem by showing that checking fhw(H)≤ k is NP-complete, even for k=2. The same construction allows us to prove also the NP-completeness of checking ghw(H)≤ k for k=2. After that, we identify meaningful restrictions that make checking for bounded ghw or fhw tractable or allow for an efficient approximation of the fhw.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Gottlob, G Lanzinger, M Pichler, R Razgon, I Complexity analysis of generalized and fractional hypertree decompositions |
| title | Complexity analysis of generalized and fractional hypertree decompositions |
| title_full | Complexity analysis of generalized and fractional hypertree decompositions |
| title_fullStr | Complexity analysis of generalized and fractional hypertree decompositions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Complexity analysis of generalized and fractional hypertree decompositions |
| title_short | Complexity analysis of generalized and fractional hypertree decompositions |
| title_sort | complexity analysis of generalized and fractional hypertree decompositions |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gottlobg complexityanalysisofgeneralizedandfractionalhypertreedecompositions AT lanzingerm complexityanalysisofgeneralizedandfractionalhypertreedecompositions AT pichlerr complexityanalysisofgeneralizedandfractionalhypertreedecompositions AT razgoni complexityanalysisofgeneralizedandfractionalhypertreedecompositions |