Intra-individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a precursor to dementia?

We used an exogenous target detection cueing paradigm to examine whether intra-individual reaction time variability (IIV) or phasic alerting varied significantly between patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) (n = 45) and healthy older adult controls (n = 31) or between those with a...

Volledige beschrijving

Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteurs: Tales, A, Leonards, U, Bompas, A, Snowden, R, Philips, M, Porter, G, Haworth, J, Wilcock, G, Bayer, A
Formaat: Journal article
Taal:English
Gepubliceerd in: 2012
_version_ 1826261810521571328
author Tales, A
Leonards, U
Bompas, A
Snowden, R
Philips, M
Porter, G
Haworth, J
Wilcock, G
Bayer, A
author_facet Tales, A
Leonards, U
Bompas, A
Snowden, R
Philips, M
Porter, G
Haworth, J
Wilcock, G
Bayer, A
author_sort Tales, A
collection OXFORD
description We used an exogenous target detection cueing paradigm to examine whether intra-individual reaction time variability (IIV) or phasic alerting varied significantly between patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) (n = 45) and healthy older adult controls (n = 31) or between those with aMCI who, within a 2.5 year follow-up period, developed dementia (n = 13) and those who did not (n = 26). Neither IIV, nor simple reaction time, differentiated aMCI from healthy aging, indicating that raised IIV and overall response slowing are not general characteristics of aMCI. However, within the aMCI group, IIV did differentiate between those who converted to dementia and those who remained with a diagnosis of aMCI (non-converters), being significantly more variable in those who later developed dementia. Furthermore, there was no difference in IIV between non-converters and healthy controls. High IIV appears related to an increased probability that an individual with aMCI will become demented within 2.5 years, rather than to amnestic dysfunction per se. In contrast, phasic alerting performance significantly differentiated aMCI from healthy aging, but failed to discriminate those with aMCI who developed dementia from those who did not. In addition, those patients with aMCI who did not develop dementia still showed a significantly poorer phasic alerting effect compared to healthy aging. The phasic alerting abnormality in aMCI compared to healthy aging does not appear specifically related to the performance of those patients for whom aMCI represents the prodromal stages of dementia.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:26:26Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1bdf4b6e-4998-40d8-9244-c6fec197e3db
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:26:26Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1bdf4b6e-4998-40d8-9244-c6fec197e3db2022-03-26T11:02:47ZIntra-individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a precursor to dementia?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1bdf4b6e-4998-40d8-9244-c6fec197e3dbEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Tales, ALeonards, UBompas, ASnowden, RPhilips, MPorter, GHaworth, JWilcock, GBayer, AWe used an exogenous target detection cueing paradigm to examine whether intra-individual reaction time variability (IIV) or phasic alerting varied significantly between patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) (n = 45) and healthy older adult controls (n = 31) or between those with aMCI who, within a 2.5 year follow-up period, developed dementia (n = 13) and those who did not (n = 26). Neither IIV, nor simple reaction time, differentiated aMCI from healthy aging, indicating that raised IIV and overall response slowing are not general characteristics of aMCI. However, within the aMCI group, IIV did differentiate between those who converted to dementia and those who remained with a diagnosis of aMCI (non-converters), being significantly more variable in those who later developed dementia. Furthermore, there was no difference in IIV between non-converters and healthy controls. High IIV appears related to an increased probability that an individual with aMCI will become demented within 2.5 years, rather than to amnestic dysfunction per se. In contrast, phasic alerting performance significantly differentiated aMCI from healthy aging, but failed to discriminate those with aMCI who developed dementia from those who did not. In addition, those patients with aMCI who did not develop dementia still showed a significantly poorer phasic alerting effect compared to healthy aging. The phasic alerting abnormality in aMCI compared to healthy aging does not appear specifically related to the performance of those patients for whom aMCI represents the prodromal stages of dementia.
spellingShingle Tales, A
Leonards, U
Bompas, A
Snowden, R
Philips, M
Porter, G
Haworth, J
Wilcock, G
Bayer, A
Intra-individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a precursor to dementia?
title Intra-individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a precursor to dementia?
title_full Intra-individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a precursor to dementia?
title_fullStr Intra-individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a precursor to dementia?
title_full_unstemmed Intra-individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a precursor to dementia?
title_short Intra-individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a precursor to dementia?
title_sort intra individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment a precursor to dementia
work_keys_str_mv AT talesa intraindividualreactiontimevariabilityinamnesticmildcognitiveimpairmentaprecursortodementia
AT leonardsu intraindividualreactiontimevariabilityinamnesticmildcognitiveimpairmentaprecursortodementia
AT bompasa intraindividualreactiontimevariabilityinamnesticmildcognitiveimpairmentaprecursortodementia
AT snowdenr intraindividualreactiontimevariabilityinamnesticmildcognitiveimpairmentaprecursortodementia
AT philipsm intraindividualreactiontimevariabilityinamnesticmildcognitiveimpairmentaprecursortodementia
AT porterg intraindividualreactiontimevariabilityinamnesticmildcognitiveimpairmentaprecursortodementia
AT haworthj intraindividualreactiontimevariabilityinamnesticmildcognitiveimpairmentaprecursortodementia
AT wilcockg intraindividualreactiontimevariabilityinamnesticmildcognitiveimpairmentaprecursortodementia
AT bayera intraindividualreactiontimevariabilityinamnesticmildcognitiveimpairmentaprecursortodementia