Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST).
Neuropsychological tests of visual perception mostly assess high-level processes like object recognition. Object recognition, however, relies on distinct mid-level processes of perceptual organization that are only implicitly tested in classical tests. Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2014
|
| _version_ | 1826261894173818880 |
|---|---|
| author | Vancleef, K Acke, E Torfs, K Demeyere, N Lafosse, C Humphreys, G Wagemans, J de-Wit, L |
| author_facet | Vancleef, K Acke, E Torfs, K Demeyere, N Lafosse, C Humphreys, G Wagemans, J de-Wit, L |
| author_sort | Vancleef, K |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Neuropsychological tests of visual perception mostly assess high-level processes like object recognition. Object recognition, however, relies on distinct mid-level processes of perceptual organization that are only implicitly tested in classical tests. Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the existing instruments are limited. To fill this gap, the Leuven perceptual organization screening test (L-POST) was developed, in which a wide range of mid-level phenomena are measured in 15 subtests. In this study, we evaluated reliability and validity of the L-POST. Performance on the test is evaluated relative to a norm sample of more than 1,500 healthy control participants. Cronbach's alpha of the norm sample and test-retest correlations for 20 patients provide evidence for adequate reliability of L-POST performance. The convergent and discriminant validity of the test was assessed in 40 brain-damaged patients, whose performance on the L-POST was compared with standard clinical tests of visual perception and other measures of cognitive function. The L-POST showed high sensitivity to visual dysfunction and decreased performance was specific to visual problems. In conclusion, the L-POST is a reliable and valid screening test for perceptual organization. It offers a useful online tool for researchers and clinicians to get a broader overview of the mid-level processes that are preserved or disrupted in a given patient. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:27:45Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:1c606be1-3847-49fb-bb81-e0bdbd671ebd |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:27:45Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:1c606be1-3847-49fb-bb81-e0bdbd671ebd2022-03-26T11:05:16ZReliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST).Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1c606be1-3847-49fb-bb81-e0bdbd671ebdEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2014Vancleef, KAcke, ETorfs, KDemeyere, NLafosse, CHumphreys, GWagemans, Jde-Wit, LNeuropsychological tests of visual perception mostly assess high-level processes like object recognition. Object recognition, however, relies on distinct mid-level processes of perceptual organization that are only implicitly tested in classical tests. Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the existing instruments are limited. To fill this gap, the Leuven perceptual organization screening test (L-POST) was developed, in which a wide range of mid-level phenomena are measured in 15 subtests. In this study, we evaluated reliability and validity of the L-POST. Performance on the test is evaluated relative to a norm sample of more than 1,500 healthy control participants. Cronbach's alpha of the norm sample and test-retest correlations for 20 patients provide evidence for adequate reliability of L-POST performance. The convergent and discriminant validity of the test was assessed in 40 brain-damaged patients, whose performance on the L-POST was compared with standard clinical tests of visual perception and other measures of cognitive function. The L-POST showed high sensitivity to visual dysfunction and decreased performance was specific to visual problems. In conclusion, the L-POST is a reliable and valid screening test for perceptual organization. It offers a useful online tool for researchers and clinicians to get a broader overview of the mid-level processes that are preserved or disrupted in a given patient. |
| spellingShingle | Vancleef, K Acke, E Torfs, K Demeyere, N Lafosse, C Humphreys, G Wagemans, J de-Wit, L Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). |
| title | Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). |
| title_full | Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). |
| title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). |
| title_short | Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). |
| title_sort | reliability and validity of the leuven perceptual organization screening test l post |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vancleefk reliabilityandvalidityoftheleuvenperceptualorganizationscreeningtestlpost AT ackee reliabilityandvalidityoftheleuvenperceptualorganizationscreeningtestlpost AT torfsk reliabilityandvalidityoftheleuvenperceptualorganizationscreeningtestlpost AT demeyeren reliabilityandvalidityoftheleuvenperceptualorganizationscreeningtestlpost AT lafossec reliabilityandvalidityoftheleuvenperceptualorganizationscreeningtestlpost AT humphreysg reliabilityandvalidityoftheleuvenperceptualorganizationscreeningtestlpost AT wagemansj reliabilityandvalidityoftheleuvenperceptualorganizationscreeningtestlpost AT dewitl reliabilityandvalidityoftheleuvenperceptualorganizationscreeningtestlpost |