Genuine modal realism and completeness
John Divers and Joseph Melia have argued that Lewis's modal realism is extensionally inadequate. This paper explains why their argument does not succeed.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2006
|
| _version_ | 1826261982700896256 |
|---|---|
| author | Paseau, A |
| author_facet | Paseau, A |
| author_sort | Paseau, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | John Divers and Joseph Melia have argued that Lewis's modal realism is extensionally inadequate. This paper explains why their argument does not succeed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:29:09Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:1cd774f6-0f8c-45bc-8bdd-b2f378520799 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:29:09Z |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:1cd774f6-0f8c-45bc-8bdd-b2f3785207992022-03-26T11:07:48ZGenuine modal realism and completenessJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1cd774f6-0f8c-45bc-8bdd-b2f378520799EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2006Paseau, AJohn Divers and Joseph Melia have argued that Lewis's modal realism is extensionally inadequate. This paper explains why their argument does not succeed. |
| spellingShingle | Paseau, A Genuine modal realism and completeness |
| title | Genuine modal realism and completeness |
| title_full | Genuine modal realism and completeness |
| title_fullStr | Genuine modal realism and completeness |
| title_full_unstemmed | Genuine modal realism and completeness |
| title_short | Genuine modal realism and completeness |
| title_sort | genuine modal realism and completeness |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT paseaua genuinemodalrealismandcompleteness |