A contact-based intervention for people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care: a pilot study.
People recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care are at high risk of suicide and self-harm, with 6% of all suicides in England occurring in the 3 months after discharge. There is some evidence from a randomized trial carried out in the United States in the 1960s-70s that supportive letters...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Routledge
2014
|
| _version_ | 1797057157409013760 |
|---|---|
| author | Bennewith, O Evans, J Donovan, J Paramasivan, S Owen-Smith, A Hollingworth, W Davies, R O'Connor, S Hawton, K Kapur, N Gunnell, D |
| author_facet | Bennewith, O Evans, J Donovan, J Paramasivan, S Owen-Smith, A Hollingworth, W Davies, R O'Connor, S Hawton, K Kapur, N Gunnell, D |
| author_sort | Bennewith, O |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | People recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care are at high risk of suicide and self-harm, with 6% of all suicides in England occurring in the 3 months after discharge. There is some evidence from a randomized trial carried out in the United States in the 1960s-70s that supportive letters sent by psychiatrists to high-risk patients in the period following hospital discharge resulted in a reduction in suicide. The aim of the current pilot study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a similar trial, but in a broader group of psychiatric discharges, in the context of present day UK clinical practice. The intervention was piloted on 3 psychiatric inpatient wards in southwest England. On 2 wards a series of 8 letters were sent to patients over the 12 months after discharge and 6 letters were sent from the third ward over a 6 month period. A total of 102 patients discharged from the wards received at least 1 letter, but only 45 (44.1%) received the full series of letters. The main reasons for drop-out were patient opt-out (n = 24) or readmission (n = 26). In the context of a policy of intensive follow-up post-discharge, qualitative interviews with service users showed that most already felt adequately supported and the intervention added little to this. Those interviewed felt that it was possible that the intervention might benefit people new to or with little follow-up from mental health services but that fewer letters should be mailed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:32:16Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:1ddb21da-3515-4c07-ac07-ba4e3e54f84c |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T19:32:16Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:1ddb21da-3515-4c07-ac07-ba4e3e54f84c2022-03-26T11:13:18ZA contact-based intervention for people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care: a pilot study.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1ddb21da-3515-4c07-ac07-ba4e3e54f84cEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordRoutledge2014Bennewith, OEvans, JDonovan, JParamasivan, SOwen-Smith, AHollingworth, WDavies, RO'Connor, SHawton, KKapur, NGunnell, DPeople recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care are at high risk of suicide and self-harm, with 6% of all suicides in England occurring in the 3 months after discharge. There is some evidence from a randomized trial carried out in the United States in the 1960s-70s that supportive letters sent by psychiatrists to high-risk patients in the period following hospital discharge resulted in a reduction in suicide. The aim of the current pilot study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a similar trial, but in a broader group of psychiatric discharges, in the context of present day UK clinical practice. The intervention was piloted on 3 psychiatric inpatient wards in southwest England. On 2 wards a series of 8 letters were sent to patients over the 12 months after discharge and 6 letters were sent from the third ward over a 6 month period. A total of 102 patients discharged from the wards received at least 1 letter, but only 45 (44.1%) received the full series of letters. The main reasons for drop-out were patient opt-out (n = 24) or readmission (n = 26). In the context of a policy of intensive follow-up post-discharge, qualitative interviews with service users showed that most already felt adequately supported and the intervention added little to this. Those interviewed felt that it was possible that the intervention might benefit people new to or with little follow-up from mental health services but that fewer letters should be mailed. |
| spellingShingle | Bennewith, O Evans, J Donovan, J Paramasivan, S Owen-Smith, A Hollingworth, W Davies, R O'Connor, S Hawton, K Kapur, N Gunnell, D A contact-based intervention for people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care: a pilot study. |
| title | A contact-based intervention for people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care: a pilot study. |
| title_full | A contact-based intervention for people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care: a pilot study. |
| title_fullStr | A contact-based intervention for people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care: a pilot study. |
| title_full_unstemmed | A contact-based intervention for people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care: a pilot study. |
| title_short | A contact-based intervention for people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care: a pilot study. |
| title_sort | contact based intervention for people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care a pilot study |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bennewitho acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT evansj acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT donovanj acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT paramasivans acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT owensmitha acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT hollingworthw acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT daviesr acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT oconnors acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT hawtonk acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT kapurn acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT gunnelld acontactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT bennewitho contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT evansj contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT donovanj contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT paramasivans contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT owensmitha contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT hollingworthw contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT daviesr contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT oconnors contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT hawtonk contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT kapurn contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy AT gunnelld contactbasedinterventionforpeoplerecentlydischargedfrominpatientpsychiatriccareapilotstudy |