On sequential Bayesian inference for continual learning
Sequential Bayesian inference can be used for continual learning to prevent catastrophic forgetting of past tasks and provide an informative prior when learning new tasks. We revisit sequential Bayesian inference and assess whether using the previous task’s posterior as a prior for a new task can pr...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI
2023
|
| _version_ | 1826310881221279744 |
|---|---|
| author | Kessler, S Cobb, A Rudner, TGJ Zohren, S Roberts, SJ Roberts, SJ |
| author_facet | Kessler, S Cobb, A Rudner, TGJ Zohren, S Roberts, SJ Roberts, SJ |
| author_sort | Kessler, S |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Sequential Bayesian inference can be used for continual learning to prevent catastrophic forgetting of past tasks and provide an informative prior when learning new tasks. We revisit sequential Bayesian inference and assess whether using the previous task’s posterior as a prior for a new task can prevent catastrophic forgetting in Bayesian neural networks. Our first contribution is to perform sequential Bayesian inference using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. We propagate the posterior as a prior for new tasks by approximating the posterior via fitting a density estimator on Hamiltonian Monte Carlo samples. We find that this approach fails to prevent catastrophic forgetting, demonstrating the difficulty in performing sequential Bayesian inference in neural networks. From there, we study simple analytical examples of sequential Bayesian inference and CL and highlight the issue of model misspecification, which can lead to sub-optimal continual learning performance despite exact inference. Furthermore, we discuss how task data imbalances can cause forgetting. From these limitations, we argue that we need probabilistic models of the continual learning generative process rather than relying on sequential Bayesian inference over Bayesian neural network weights. Our final contribution is to propose a simple baseline called Prototypical Bayesian Continual Learning, which is competitive with the best performing Bayesian continual learning methods on class incremental continual learning computer vision benchmarks. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:00:02Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:1e1ac507-d725-4db5-a5bf-fb46fd4c501f |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:00:02Z |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | MDPI |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:1e1ac507-d725-4db5-a5bf-fb46fd4c501f2023-09-18T15:44:59ZOn sequential Bayesian inference for continual learningJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1e1ac507-d725-4db5-a5bf-fb46fd4c501fEnglishSymplectic ElementsMDPI2023Kessler, SCobb, ARudner, TGJZohren, SRoberts, SJRoberts, SJSequential Bayesian inference can be used for continual learning to prevent catastrophic forgetting of past tasks and provide an informative prior when learning new tasks. We revisit sequential Bayesian inference and assess whether using the previous task’s posterior as a prior for a new task can prevent catastrophic forgetting in Bayesian neural networks. Our first contribution is to perform sequential Bayesian inference using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. We propagate the posterior as a prior for new tasks by approximating the posterior via fitting a density estimator on Hamiltonian Monte Carlo samples. We find that this approach fails to prevent catastrophic forgetting, demonstrating the difficulty in performing sequential Bayesian inference in neural networks. From there, we study simple analytical examples of sequential Bayesian inference and CL and highlight the issue of model misspecification, which can lead to sub-optimal continual learning performance despite exact inference. Furthermore, we discuss how task data imbalances can cause forgetting. From these limitations, we argue that we need probabilistic models of the continual learning generative process rather than relying on sequential Bayesian inference over Bayesian neural network weights. Our final contribution is to propose a simple baseline called Prototypical Bayesian Continual Learning, which is competitive with the best performing Bayesian continual learning methods on class incremental continual learning computer vision benchmarks. |
| spellingShingle | Kessler, S Cobb, A Rudner, TGJ Zohren, S Roberts, SJ Roberts, SJ On sequential Bayesian inference for continual learning |
| title | On sequential Bayesian inference for continual learning |
| title_full | On sequential Bayesian inference for continual learning |
| title_fullStr | On sequential Bayesian inference for continual learning |
| title_full_unstemmed | On sequential Bayesian inference for continual learning |
| title_short | On sequential Bayesian inference for continual learning |
| title_sort | on sequential bayesian inference for continual learning |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kesslers onsequentialbayesianinferenceforcontinuallearning AT cobba onsequentialbayesianinferenceforcontinuallearning AT rudnertgj onsequentialbayesianinferenceforcontinuallearning AT zohrens onsequentialbayesianinferenceforcontinuallearning AT robertssj onsequentialbayesianinferenceforcontinuallearning AT robertssj onsequentialbayesianinferenceforcontinuallearning |