The irrelevance of a moral right to privacy for biomedical moral enhancement
In opposition to what we claimed in Unfit for the Future, Jan Christoph Bublitz argues that people have a right to privacy which stands in the way of the use of biomedical moral enhancement. We reply that it is not clear that he has understood what we mean by a right to privacy, that we were speakin...
Main Authors: | Persson, I, Savulescu, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Springer Verlag
2017
|
Similar Items
-
The evolution of moral progress and biomedical moral enhancement
by: Persson, I, et al.
Published: (2019) -
GETTING MORAL ENHANCEMENT RIGHT: THE DESIRABILITY OF MORAL BIOENHANCEMENT
by: Persson, I, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Getting moral enhancement right: the desirability of moral bioenhancement.
by: Persson, I, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Biomedical moral enhancement – not a lever without a fulcrum
by: Persson, I, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Moral hard-wiring and moral enhancement
by: Persson, I, et al.
Published: (2017)