Evaluating optimal superficial limb perfusion at different angles using non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry.

BACKGROUND: It is common practice to elevate the limbs postoperatively to reduce oedema and hence optimise perfusion and facilitate rehabilitation. However, elevation may be counterproductive as it reduces the mean perfusion pressure. There are no clear data on the optimal position of the limbs eve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darmanin, G, Jaggard, M, Hettiaratchy, S, Nanchahal, J, Jain, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2013
_version_ 1826262298367361024
author Darmanin, G
Jaggard, M
Hettiaratchy, S
Nanchahal, J
Jain, A
author_facet Darmanin, G
Jaggard, M
Hettiaratchy, S
Nanchahal, J
Jain, A
author_sort Darmanin, G
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: It is common practice to elevate the limbs postoperatively to reduce oedema and hence optimise perfusion and facilitate rehabilitation. However, elevation may be counterproductive as it reduces the mean perfusion pressure. There are no clear data on the optimal position of the limbs even in normal subjects. METHODS: The optimal position of limbs was investigated in 25 healthy subjects using a non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry system "O2C", which indirectly measures skin and superficial tissue perfusion through blood flow, oxygen saturation and relative haemoglobin concentration. RESULTS: We found a reduction in skin and superficial tissue blood flow of 17% (p=0.0001) on arm elevation (180° shoulder flexion) as compared to heart level and an increase in skin and superficial tissue blood flow of 25% (p=0.02) on forearm elevation of 45°. Lower limb skin and superficial tissue blood flow decreased by 15% (p=0.004) on elevation to 47 cm and by 70% on dependency (p=0.0001) compared to heart level. However, on elevation of the lower limb there was also a 28% reduction in superficial venous pooling (p=0.0001) compared to heart level. CONCLUSIONS: In the normal limb, the position for optimal superficial perfusion of the upper limb is with the arm placed at heart level and forearm at 45°. In the lower limb the optimal position for superficial perfusion would be at heart level. However, some degree of elevation may be useful if there is an element of venous congestion.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:34:11Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1e7a9ad9-e3d7-4e3e-ae1e-825ae8d61a85
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:34:11Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1e7a9ad9-e3d7-4e3e-ae1e-825ae8d61a852022-03-26T11:16:34ZEvaluating optimal superficial limb perfusion at different angles using non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1e7a9ad9-e3d7-4e3e-ae1e-825ae8d61a85EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Darmanin, GJaggard, MHettiaratchy, SNanchahal, JJain, A BACKGROUND: It is common practice to elevate the limbs postoperatively to reduce oedema and hence optimise perfusion and facilitate rehabilitation. However, elevation may be counterproductive as it reduces the mean perfusion pressure. There are no clear data on the optimal position of the limbs even in normal subjects. METHODS: The optimal position of limbs was investigated in 25 healthy subjects using a non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry system "O2C", which indirectly measures skin and superficial tissue perfusion through blood flow, oxygen saturation and relative haemoglobin concentration. RESULTS: We found a reduction in skin and superficial tissue blood flow of 17% (p=0.0001) on arm elevation (180° shoulder flexion) as compared to heart level and an increase in skin and superficial tissue blood flow of 25% (p=0.02) on forearm elevation of 45°. Lower limb skin and superficial tissue blood flow decreased by 15% (p=0.004) on elevation to 47 cm and by 70% on dependency (p=0.0001) compared to heart level. However, on elevation of the lower limb there was also a 28% reduction in superficial venous pooling (p=0.0001) compared to heart level. CONCLUSIONS: In the normal limb, the position for optimal superficial perfusion of the upper limb is with the arm placed at heart level and forearm at 45°. In the lower limb the optimal position for superficial perfusion would be at heart level. However, some degree of elevation may be useful if there is an element of venous congestion.
spellingShingle Darmanin, G
Jaggard, M
Hettiaratchy, S
Nanchahal, J
Jain, A
Evaluating optimal superficial limb perfusion at different angles using non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry.
title Evaluating optimal superficial limb perfusion at different angles using non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry.
title_full Evaluating optimal superficial limb perfusion at different angles using non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry.
title_fullStr Evaluating optimal superficial limb perfusion at different angles using non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating optimal superficial limb perfusion at different angles using non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry.
title_short Evaluating optimal superficial limb perfusion at different angles using non-invasive micro-lightguide spectrophotometry.
title_sort evaluating optimal superficial limb perfusion at different angles using non invasive micro lightguide spectrophotometry
work_keys_str_mv AT darmaning evaluatingoptimalsuperficiallimbperfusionatdifferentanglesusingnoninvasivemicrolightguidespectrophotometry
AT jaggardm evaluatingoptimalsuperficiallimbperfusionatdifferentanglesusingnoninvasivemicrolightguidespectrophotometry
AT hettiaratchys evaluatingoptimalsuperficiallimbperfusionatdifferentanglesusingnoninvasivemicrolightguidespectrophotometry
AT nanchahalj evaluatingoptimalsuperficiallimbperfusionatdifferentanglesusingnoninvasivemicrolightguidespectrophotometry
AT jaina evaluatingoptimalsuperficiallimbperfusionatdifferentanglesusingnoninvasivemicrolightguidespectrophotometry