Embracing the complexity of extreme weather events when quantifying their likelihood of recurrence in a warming world

Global-average temperatures are a powerful metric for both long-term climate change policy, and also to measure the aggregate fluctuations in weather experienced around the world. However, here we show how the consideration of anomalies in annual temperatures at the global land-average scale, partic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harrington, L, Lewis, S, Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S, King, A, Otto, F
Format: Journal article
Published: IOP Publishing 2019
_version_ 1826262330028064768
author Harrington, L
Lewis, S
Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S
King, A
Otto, F
author_facet Harrington, L
Lewis, S
Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S
King, A
Otto, F
author_sort Harrington, L
collection OXFORD
description Global-average temperatures are a powerful metric for both long-term climate change policy, and also to measure the aggregate fluctuations in weather experienced around the world. However, here we show how the consideration of anomalies in annual temperatures at the global land-average scale, particularly during extremely hot years, tends to overestimate the perceived severity of extreme heat actually felt by local communities during these events. Thus, when global-mean temperatures are used as a proxy to infer the role of climate change on the likelihood of witnessing hot years, the component of extreme event risk attributed to human influence can also be overstated. This study suggests multiple alternative approaches to characterise extreme weather events which have complex spatial signatures, each of which improve the representation of perceived experiences from the event when compared with the default approach of using area-averaged time-series. However, as the definition of an extreme event becomes more specific to the observed characteristics witnessed, changes are needed in the way researchers discuss the likelihood of witnessing 'similar events' with future climate change. Using the example of the 2016 hot year, we propose an alternative framework, termed the 'Time of Maximum Similarity', to show that events like the record-breaking annual temperatures of 2016 are most likely to be witnessed between 2010–2037, with hot years thereafter becoming significantly more severe than the heat of 2016.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:34:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1ea4fddb-d927-4795-abe0-824f767fb92f
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:34:43Z
publishDate 2019
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1ea4fddb-d927-4795-abe0-824f767fb92f2022-03-26T11:17:33ZEmbracing the complexity of extreme weather events when quantifying their likelihood of recurrence in a warming worldJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1ea4fddb-d927-4795-abe0-824f767fb92fSymplectic Elements at OxfordIOP Publishing2019Harrington, LLewis, SPerkins-Kirkpatrick, SKing, AOtto, FGlobal-average temperatures are a powerful metric for both long-term climate change policy, and also to measure the aggregate fluctuations in weather experienced around the world. However, here we show how the consideration of anomalies in annual temperatures at the global land-average scale, particularly during extremely hot years, tends to overestimate the perceived severity of extreme heat actually felt by local communities during these events. Thus, when global-mean temperatures are used as a proxy to infer the role of climate change on the likelihood of witnessing hot years, the component of extreme event risk attributed to human influence can also be overstated. This study suggests multiple alternative approaches to characterise extreme weather events which have complex spatial signatures, each of which improve the representation of perceived experiences from the event when compared with the default approach of using area-averaged time-series. However, as the definition of an extreme event becomes more specific to the observed characteristics witnessed, changes are needed in the way researchers discuss the likelihood of witnessing 'similar events' with future climate change. Using the example of the 2016 hot year, we propose an alternative framework, termed the 'Time of Maximum Similarity', to show that events like the record-breaking annual temperatures of 2016 are most likely to be witnessed between 2010–2037, with hot years thereafter becoming significantly more severe than the heat of 2016.
spellingShingle Harrington, L
Lewis, S
Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S
King, A
Otto, F
Embracing the complexity of extreme weather events when quantifying their likelihood of recurrence in a warming world
title Embracing the complexity of extreme weather events when quantifying their likelihood of recurrence in a warming world
title_full Embracing the complexity of extreme weather events when quantifying their likelihood of recurrence in a warming world
title_fullStr Embracing the complexity of extreme weather events when quantifying their likelihood of recurrence in a warming world
title_full_unstemmed Embracing the complexity of extreme weather events when quantifying their likelihood of recurrence in a warming world
title_short Embracing the complexity of extreme weather events when quantifying their likelihood of recurrence in a warming world
title_sort embracing the complexity of extreme weather events when quantifying their likelihood of recurrence in a warming world
work_keys_str_mv AT harringtonl embracingthecomplexityofextremeweathereventswhenquantifyingtheirlikelihoodofrecurrenceinawarmingworld
AT lewiss embracingthecomplexityofextremeweathereventswhenquantifyingtheirlikelihoodofrecurrenceinawarmingworld
AT perkinskirkpatricks embracingthecomplexityofextremeweathereventswhenquantifyingtheirlikelihoodofrecurrenceinawarmingworld
AT kinga embracingthecomplexityofextremeweathereventswhenquantifyingtheirlikelihoodofrecurrenceinawarmingworld
AT ottof embracingthecomplexityofextremeweathereventswhenquantifyingtheirlikelihoodofrecurrenceinawarmingworld