Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
<p><strong>Objectives:</strong> Risk of bias assessments are important in meta-analyses of both aggregate and individual participant data (IPD). There is limited evidence on whether and how risk of bias of included studies or datasets in IPD meta-analyses (IPDMAs) is assessed. We r...
Main Authors: | Levis, B, Snell, KIE, Damen, JAA, Hattle, M, Ensor, J, Dhiman, P, Andaur Navarro, CL, Takwoingi, Y, Whiting, PF, Debray, TPA, Reitsma, JB, Moons, KGM, Collins, GS, Riley, RD |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Similar Items
-
Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
by: Snell, KIE, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
by: Debray, TPA, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
by: Debray, TPA, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2023)