Cost-utility analysis of stenting versus endarterectomy in the international carotid stenting study
<p>BACKGROUND: The International Carotid Stenting Study was a multicenter randomized trial in which patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were randomly allocated to treatment by carotid stenting or endarterectomy. Economic evidence comparing these treatments is limited and inconsis...
Main Authors: | Morris, S, Patel, N, Dobson, J, Featherstone, R, Richards, T, Luengo-Fernandez, R, Rothwell, P, Brown, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Similar Items
-
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis
by: Featherstone, R, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis
by: Roland L Featherstone, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01) -
Carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: evidence basis and cost implications.
by: Janssen, M, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Incidence, impact, and predictors of cranial nerve palsy and haematoma following carotid endarterectomy in the international carotid stenting study
by: Doig, D, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Effects of carotid endarterectomy or stenting on hemodynamic complications in the international carotid stenting study: a randomized comparison
by: Altinbas, A, et al.
Published: (2013)