Hearing crackles: why all GPs should pass PACES

<p>As a GP registrar, the MRCGP Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) exam is currently at the forefront of my mind. Vocational Training Scheme teaching focuses on how to pass, evenings are spent revising, and my bank account, now £1700 lighter, still makes me shudder. And yet, perhaps naively, it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brettell, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Royal College of General Practitioners 2016
_version_ 1797057578148036608
author Brettell, R
author_facet Brettell, R
author_sort Brettell, R
collection OXFORD
description <p>As a GP registrar, the MRCGP Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) exam is currently at the forefront of my mind. Vocational Training Scheme teaching focuses on how to pass, evenings are spent revising, and my bank account, now £1700 lighter, still makes me shudder. And yet, perhaps naively, it was still a shock to me to find out that at no point in the CSA exam am I expected to accurately detect real clinical signs. Of course, the CSA assesses many other important skills, including problem-solving skills, personcentred care, and attitudinal aspects.1 My argument is certainly not with the inclusion of these. However, given that ‘The validity of the CSA resides in its realistic simulation of reallife consultations’,2 it seems strange that it includes no real patients, and consequentlyno real physical signs, both somewhat important components, I would argue, of many real-life consultations.</p> <br/> <p>By contrast, the clinical component of Membership of the Royal College of Physicians (MRCP), the PACES exam (Practical Assessment of Clinical Examination Skills), 3 involves real patients with a given condition. Candidates undertake a respiratory, abdominal, cardiovascular, and neurological exam, as well as a history station, communication and ethics station, and two brief clinical consultations. In these, candidates are given 8 minutes with a patient to take a focused history, carry out a relevant examination, respond to the patient’s concerns, and explain a management plan.</p> <br/> <p>This PACES exam is robust, and considered a rite of passage for medical trainees, who often require multiple attempts to pass. To a GP trainee it often seems unattainably tough. When colleagues pass, we congratulate them, but we also breathe a sigh of relief that we don’t have to go through the same arduous process, and, in doing so, we perhaps elevate our colleagues above ourselves.</p> <br/> <p>I would argue that this is wrong on many levels. This veneration of MRCP gives the impression that our exit exams are ‘easier’, or that we couldn’t pass a more robust exam should we need to. As a GP trainee who decided to undertake my MRCP exam, I would argue this is far from the truth.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:38:27Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1fd5db56-1f2a-4afe-8dbb-670f820746f2
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:38:27Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1fd5db56-1f2a-4afe-8dbb-670f820746f22022-03-26T11:24:11ZHearing crackles: why all GPs should pass PACESJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1fd5db56-1f2a-4afe-8dbb-670f820746f2EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordRoyal College of General Practitioners2016Brettell, R<p>As a GP registrar, the MRCGP Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) exam is currently at the forefront of my mind. Vocational Training Scheme teaching focuses on how to pass, evenings are spent revising, and my bank account, now £1700 lighter, still makes me shudder. And yet, perhaps naively, it was still a shock to me to find out that at no point in the CSA exam am I expected to accurately detect real clinical signs. Of course, the CSA assesses many other important skills, including problem-solving skills, personcentred care, and attitudinal aspects.1 My argument is certainly not with the inclusion of these. However, given that ‘The validity of the CSA resides in its realistic simulation of reallife consultations’,2 it seems strange that it includes no real patients, and consequentlyno real physical signs, both somewhat important components, I would argue, of many real-life consultations.</p> <br/> <p>By contrast, the clinical component of Membership of the Royal College of Physicians (MRCP), the PACES exam (Practical Assessment of Clinical Examination Skills), 3 involves real patients with a given condition. Candidates undertake a respiratory, abdominal, cardiovascular, and neurological exam, as well as a history station, communication and ethics station, and two brief clinical consultations. In these, candidates are given 8 minutes with a patient to take a focused history, carry out a relevant examination, respond to the patient’s concerns, and explain a management plan.</p> <br/> <p>This PACES exam is robust, and considered a rite of passage for medical trainees, who often require multiple attempts to pass. To a GP trainee it often seems unattainably tough. When colleagues pass, we congratulate them, but we also breathe a sigh of relief that we don’t have to go through the same arduous process, and, in doing so, we perhaps elevate our colleagues above ourselves.</p> <br/> <p>I would argue that this is wrong on many levels. This veneration of MRCP gives the impression that our exit exams are ‘easier’, or that we couldn’t pass a more robust exam should we need to. As a GP trainee who decided to undertake my MRCP exam, I would argue this is far from the truth.</p>
spellingShingle Brettell, R
Hearing crackles: why all GPs should pass PACES
title Hearing crackles: why all GPs should pass PACES
title_full Hearing crackles: why all GPs should pass PACES
title_fullStr Hearing crackles: why all GPs should pass PACES
title_full_unstemmed Hearing crackles: why all GPs should pass PACES
title_short Hearing crackles: why all GPs should pass PACES
title_sort hearing crackles why all gps should pass paces
work_keys_str_mv AT brettellr hearingcrackleswhyallgpsshouldpasspaces