Motor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of marital status with risk of motor vehicle driver injury. DESIGN: A cohort study with prospective and retrospective outcomes. SETTING: New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10,525 adults (a volunteer sample of a multi-industry workforce, n = 8008; and a ra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Whitlock, G, Norton, R, Clark, T, Jackson, R, MacMahon, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2004
_version_ 1797057614561935360
author Whitlock, G
Norton, R
Clark, T
Jackson, R
MacMahon, S
author_facet Whitlock, G
Norton, R
Clark, T
Jackson, R
MacMahon, S
author_sort Whitlock, G
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of marital status with risk of motor vehicle driver injury. DESIGN: A cohort study with prospective and retrospective outcomes. SETTING: New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10,525 adults (a volunteer sample of a multi-industry workforce, n = 8008; and a random sample of urban electoral rolls, n = 2517). EXPOSURE VARIABLE: Self reported marital status, assessed from a questionnaire administered in 1992-93 (baseline). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Motor vehicle driver injury resulting in admission of the driver to hospital and/or the driver's death, during the period 1988-98; hospitalisation and mortality data were obtained by record linkage to national health databases. RESULTS: During 108 741 person-years of follow up, 139 driver injury cases occurred (85 before baseline, 54 after). After adjustment for age, sex, and study cohort, never married participants had twice the risk of driver injury (hazard ratio [HR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35 to 3.16) as married participants (HR 1.00). The relative risk for never married participants was slightly higher (HR 2.29), though less precise (95% CI 1.39 to 3.76), after further adjustment for alcohol intake, driving exposure, area of residence, body mass index, and occupational status. CONCLUSIONS: After taking age, sex, and other variables into account, never married people had a substantially higher risk of driver injury than married people. While requiring corroboration, these findings imply that it may be appropriate for driver injury countermeasures to be targeted to never married people.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:38:54Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:1ffb02ed-90c2-49f2-be8d-d81e09951b54
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:38:54Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:1ffb02ed-90c2-49f2-be8d-d81e09951b542022-03-26T11:25:03ZMotor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:1ffb02ed-90c2-49f2-be8d-d81e09951b54EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2004Whitlock, GNorton, RClark, TJackson, RMacMahon, SOBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of marital status with risk of motor vehicle driver injury. DESIGN: A cohort study with prospective and retrospective outcomes. SETTING: New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10,525 adults (a volunteer sample of a multi-industry workforce, n = 8008; and a random sample of urban electoral rolls, n = 2517). EXPOSURE VARIABLE: Self reported marital status, assessed from a questionnaire administered in 1992-93 (baseline). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Motor vehicle driver injury resulting in admission of the driver to hospital and/or the driver's death, during the period 1988-98; hospitalisation and mortality data were obtained by record linkage to national health databases. RESULTS: During 108 741 person-years of follow up, 139 driver injury cases occurred (85 before baseline, 54 after). After adjustment for age, sex, and study cohort, never married participants had twice the risk of driver injury (hazard ratio [HR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35 to 3.16) as married participants (HR 1.00). The relative risk for never married participants was slightly higher (HR 2.29), though less precise (95% CI 1.39 to 3.76), after further adjustment for alcohol intake, driving exposure, area of residence, body mass index, and occupational status. CONCLUSIONS: After taking age, sex, and other variables into account, never married people had a substantially higher risk of driver injury than married people. While requiring corroboration, these findings imply that it may be appropriate for driver injury countermeasures to be targeted to never married people.
spellingShingle Whitlock, G
Norton, R
Clark, T
Jackson, R
MacMahon, S
Motor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries.
title Motor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries.
title_full Motor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries.
title_fullStr Motor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries.
title_full_unstemmed Motor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries.
title_short Motor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries.
title_sort motor vehicle driver injury and marital status a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries
work_keys_str_mv AT whitlockg motorvehicledriverinjuryandmaritalstatusacohortstudywithprospectiveandretrospectivedriverinjuries
AT nortonr motorvehicledriverinjuryandmaritalstatusacohortstudywithprospectiveandretrospectivedriverinjuries
AT clarkt motorvehicledriverinjuryandmaritalstatusacohortstudywithprospectiveandretrospectivedriverinjuries
AT jacksonr motorvehicledriverinjuryandmaritalstatusacohortstudywithprospectiveandretrospectivedriverinjuries
AT macmahons motorvehicledriverinjuryandmaritalstatusacohortstudywithprospectiveandretrospectivedriverinjuries