Time to switch from CLSI to EUCAST? a Southeast Asian perspective
Despite the importance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) to clinical management of infection and to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance, methodologies and breakpoints of the two most commonly used systems worldwide, CLSI and EUCAST, are far from harmonized. Most laboratories in r...
Main Authors: | Cusack, T, Ashley, E, Ling, C, Roberts, T, Turner, P, Wangrangsimakul, T, Dance, D |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Títulos similares
-
Impact of CLSI and EUCAST breakpoint discrepancies on reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility and AMR surveillance
por: Cusack, T-P, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Effect of Differences in the CLSI and EUCAST Criteria on the Interpretation of Enterobacteriaceae Sensitivity to Carbapenems
por: L. A. Kornoukhova, et al.
Publicado: (2021-10-01) -
Evaluations of Antifungal Susceptibilities Have to Be According to Reference Guidelines: CLSI and EUCAST
por: Ali Korhan Sığ
Publicado: (2022-01-01) -
Estudo comparativo entre as metodologias preconizadas pelo CLSI e pelo EUCAST para avaliação da atividade antifúngica Comparative study of the recommended methodologies by CLSI and EUCAST for activity evaluation antifungal
por: Marcos Aurélio Stoppa, et al.
Publicado: (2009-01-01) -
Novedades CLSI y EUCAST 2024 sobre detección y uso de antibióticos
por: Diego Herrera, et al.
Publicado: (2024-08-01)